Will Climate Legislation Get Shoved Aside Again?


There was talk late last week that the climate and energy package might be revamped and rebranded as the “BP Spill Bill,” a package that combines the energy bill passed last summer, the carbon-reduction provisions in the bill from John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), and new rules governing the oil industry. But the third-ranking Democrat in the Senate today suggested that climate provisions would have to come in the form of an amendment – making their future this year even more bleak.

New York Sen. Chuck Schumer said Monday that he expects that the energy bill that passed last summer will likely serve as the starting point for the package. That measure, authored by Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), has been criticize as a “flashback to Bush energy policy,” since it lacks any kind of cap on carbon and contains many concessions to the oil, coal, gas, and nuclear industries. That bill, said Schumer in an appearance on MSNBC, would be “the base bill upon which John Kerry will seek to add his bill,” likely in the form of an amendment.

“Kerry has a proposal that has pretty broad support,” said Schumer. “He’s going, in my opinion, going to get a chance to offer it in the form of an amendment.”

Schumer tried to put a positive spin on it, but making climate a mere add-on would be a major setback for Kerry’s drive to get the bill passed this year. Combining it with the oil spill-related provisions created an opportunity for an issue that has been less than palatable for many Democrats this year. “Of course, the extreme people on each side say it’s not good enough,” said Schumer. “But he’s done a damn good job, and he’s going to, in my opinion, get a chance to offer that amendment, and we’ll see if it has the votes.”

A Schumer spokesman walked back from the comments in an email to the National Journal, saying that “no decisions have been made yet on the floor strategy for legislation.” Kerry and Schumer are supposed to meet later this week to discuss plans. Majority Leader Harry Reid, who will ultimately be responsible for uniting legislation into a single package, is slated to meet with Kerry, Bingaman, and other committee chairs on Thursday to discuss the measure.

There’s a lot going on this week in climate-related news. This morning, Dick Lugar (R-Ind.) was slated to introduce his own energy package, an alternative to the Kerry-Lieberman bill, at a press conference, but it was delayed due to a flight cancellation. Lugar outlined the measure back in March, which mostly relies on improved fuel economy standards and a massive expansion of nuclear power, with no firm limits on carbon pollution. There was a range of reactions from environmental groups on the Lugar effort, noting basically that his measure doesn’t do enough on climate, but that it should be taken as a positive sign that he wants to engage on the subject. Ever since Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) walked away from the Kerry-Lieberman effort, the bill has been lacking any Republican support.

Also this week, Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is planning to offer her measure to block the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. As of last count, she had 41 votes lined up for the measure, which requires 51 votes to pass.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate