Lessig’s Change Congress Targets Dem Senator

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Last week, copyright guru Lawrence Lessig‘s Change Congress organization, which hopes to reduce the influence of money in politics, accused Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) of undermining Americans’ faith in politics by creating the appearance of corruption.

What exactly did the Senator do wrong? Well, Nelson accepted over $2 million in campaign cash from the insurance industry. He also happened to embrace the industry’s position on health care reform, declaring his opposition to giving Americans the option of a government-run health care plan. (Nelson has since hedged a bit.)

Nelson’s behavior is an example of “Good souls corruption,” Lessig explained: “legal, even ethical acts that reasonably lead the public to wonder whether it is the merits or the money that is driving this Senator’s decision.”

ben nelson adAs I wrote last week, Nelson seemed to take the criticism both seriously and personally, lashing out in a defensive press release. But Change Congress hasn’t let up. This week, the non-profit launched an internet ad targeted at Nebraskans (you can see an image of the ad to the left) but this effort isn’t nearly as effective as the mailer.

Congress’ first attacks on Nelson were potent because they were harsh and they zeroed in on the issue of corruption. The original mailer asked whether Nelson would “sell out Nebraska for $2 million?” That directness has prompted politicians to respond to CC’s attacks, often emotionally. It’s the responses that will draw the most media attention to Lessig’s cause.

This latest ad is much weaker because it focuses on health care. There’s no indication that the CC is talking about what Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor has suggested are basically “bribes”—huge sums that lawmakers raise from businesses and special interest groups in order to win re-election. A more effective ad would have mirrored the mailer or just gone ahead and used the word “corruption.”

The new ad also runs the risk of pigeonholing campaign-finance reform as a liberal cause, not a public good. Government-run health insurance is a great idea, but it’s also a liberal one. Next time, the organization would do well to highlight an issue that isn’t identified so closely with the left. If Lessig really wants to change congress, he and his supporters need to convince everyday conservatives that money in politics hurts them, too.

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate