Senators Can’t Stop Quoting Taylor Swift Lyrics During Ticketmaster Hearing

“May I suggest, respectfully, that Ticketmaster look in the mirror and say, ‘I’m the problem. It’s me.'”

Penny Harrison and her son Parker Harrison rally against the live entertainment ticket industry outside the U.S. Capitol January 24, 2023 in Washington, DC. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The pre-sale for Taylor Swift’s “Eras” tour imploded in November, when tens of thousands of fans waited unsuccessfully in hours-long Ticketmaster and still failed to secure tickets. Empty-handed super fans were then devastated a second time when, later that week, Ticketmaster cancelled its scheduled public sale for remaining tickets, citing “extraordinarily high demands on ticketing systems and insufficient remaining ticket inventory.”

Fans blamed Ticketmaster. Taylor Swift blamed Ticketmaster. Congress blamed Ticketmaster. But Ticketmaster argued the pre-sale blunder was largely due to an unprecedented number of people seeking concert tickets, paired with a never-before-seen onslaught of bots that were attempting to buy up the tickets in order to scalp them. 

Joe Berchtold, chief financial officer of Ticketmaster parent Live Nation, doubled down on that theory during a Tuesday hearing before the Senate Judiciary’s Subcommittee on Competition Policy. Though he expressed remorse for the negative experience fans had and promised Ticketmaster would do better, Berchtold also called on Congress to “recognize how industrial scalpers breaking the law using bots and cyberattacks to try to unfairly gain tickets contributes to an awful consumer experience.”

Several bipartisan members of the subcommittee were flummoxed by the lack of accountability. Many quoted Taylor Swift lyrics to tell him so. “Live Nation and Ticketmaster is the 800-pound gorilla here. You have clear dominance, monopolistic control. This whole concert-ticket system is a mess. A monopolistic mess,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said. “May I suggest, respectfully, that Ticketmaster look in the mirror and say, ‘I’m the problem. It’s me,'” he added, citing lyrics to Swift’s 2022 banger, Anti-Hero.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), the top Republican on the subcommittee, added a reference from another 2022 song, Karma“Karma’s a relaxing thought,” he said. “Aren’t you envious that for you it’s not?”

To the frustrated Senators, the Taylor Swift ticket pre-sale fiasco wasn’t an isolated accident brought on by bots or high demand, but the festering symptom of a malignant monopoly that Ticketmaster and parent company Live Nation has created over the years by dominating ticket sales, ticket re-sales, event spaces, and event promotion.

Ticketmaster controls upwards of 70-80 percent of the ticket market in the US, raking in an estimated $750 million in profits annually. Since its 2010 merger with the country’s largest live-event promoter, Live Nation, the brand has also expanded its umbrella to own dozens of venues that house the shows for which Ticketmaster sells tickets, allowing the parent company to control both the ticket and venue fees in some cases.

While many venues are independently owned and operated, witnesses at the hearing testified that the venues not owned by Live Nation often feel pressured to use Ticketmaster for ticket sales, lest Live Nation withhold future events from being housed at their facilities.

“This is all the definition of monopoly,” Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), the chair of the subcommittee, said. 

The Department of Justice only permitted Ticketmaster to merge with Live Nation in 2010 if they entered into a consent decree that prohibited the newly combined company from retaliating against concert venues for using ticketing companies other than Ticketmaster.

Yet in subsequent years, the DOJ found evidence that Ticketmaster and Live Nation were not complying with the stipulations of the decree. For example, after a venue told Live Nation it was going to use a Ticketmaster competitor, Live Nation allegedly responded that they would cease booking shows unless no other venues in the location remained, according to one DOJ filing. Ticketmaster allegedly warned a separate venue that its response “would be nuclear” if the venue used a ticket service other than Ticketmaster.

Such allegations prompted the DOJ to modify and extend its consent decree with Live Nation until 2025 “to make clear that such conduct is prohibited.”

But competitors feel the updated consent decree is still insufficient. “Venues fear losing Live Nation concerts if they don’t use Ticketmaster,” Jack Groetzinger the CEO of SeatGeek, a Ticketmaster competitor, said during the hearing. “The only way to restore competition in this industry is to break up Ticketmaster and Live Nation.” 

A break-up of this magnitude would be even messier than those depicted in Swift’s songs, as it would likely require venues having to publicly lay out the abuses they’ve suffered under the mega-company.

“In a situation where there is pervasive fear of the dominant firm, where venues and promoters and other independent rivals will potentially suffer consequences… to get someone to take that risk is not an easy ask,” testified Kathleen Bradish, the vice president for legal advocacy at the American Antitrust Institute. 

Regulatory action remains possible, despite the challenges. The DOJ is reportedly investigating the company after it bungled Swift’s pre-sale event.

And Congress can take its own legislative actions to reign in Ticketmaster’s market control—which Klobuchar said was one potential course of action at the outset of Tuesday’s hearing. 

Lee, the Utah Republican, called for new antitrust regulation or “better enforcement of existing laws.” Meanwhile, Blumenthal mentioned re-upping the BOSS Act, which would, among other things, require ticket sellers be more transparent about where ticket fees go, and prohibit primary ticket sellers from restricting the ability of a purchaser to resell tickets.

For now, the final outcome of the scrutiny remains to be seen. The resounding message to Ticketmaster, however, rang crystal clear.

To quote the pop-star who inspired Tuesday’s hearing: “Look what you made me do.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate