Georgia Senate Race Heads to Runoff, Again

Raphael Warnock and Herschel Walker will face off in December.

Mother Jones; Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/AP; Bob Andres/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Georgia’s election results are in, and the winner of the race that could determine control of the US Senate is…nobody. Not yet, anyway.

The polls are closed. Only four other Senate races have not yet been called. But multiple media outlets are projecting that neither incumbent Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock nor GOP nominee Herschel Walker will win a majority of the vote in Georgia.

Because neither major candidate surpassed the 50-percent threshold needed to win—thanks in part to Libertarian candidate Chase Oliver, who currently has 2 percent of the vote—Warnock and Walker will face off again in a December 6 runoff.

Georgia is one of just a handful of states that use runoffs to decide Senate races.

This is not the first time this has happened in the Peach State: A similar situation unfolded in the 2020 cycle, when both Warnock and Georgia Democrat Jon Ossoff defeated Republican incumbents in runoffs.

Warnock, a Baptist pastor at the church where Martin Luther King Jr. used to preach, held a narrow lead in the polls over Walker up until the very end of October, at which point Walker narrowly overtook him, according to polling averaged by FiveThirtyEight. Warnock currently leads that actual vote count by about 1 percentage point.

Meanwhile, Walker, a Heisman Trophy Winner and 12-season NFL player, has been beset by a string of scandals: The anti-abortion candidate has been accused of encouraging multiple women to obtain abortions, and funding them. He’s also alleged to be an absentee father to some of his children, despite calling the absence of fathers “a major, major problem” in Black households. And then there are his confusing statements about being healed of his rare, and controversial mental health diagnosis: dissociative identity disorder. (Some experts say it is generally a condition that requires prolonged treatment; other experts doubt the condition exists at all.)

While incumbent GOP Gov. Brian Kemp’s commanding win over Democrat Stacey Abrams—he’s ahead 53-46 as of Wednesday morning—indicates that some Republican-leaning voters in Georgia couldn’t stomach voting for Walker, the embattled candidate won over enough Republicans to earn another month on the campaign trail.

One reason for that may be that, for many, the race was more about gaining control of the Senate than about supporting any specific candidate. “I don’t care if Herschel Walker paid to abort endangered baby eagles,” conservative commentator Dana Loesch said, for example. “I want control of the Senate.”

Whether Republicans get that control remains to be seen. They’d have to win three out of the four remaining uncalled Senate races.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate