November 13, 2022

Election-Denying Secretary of State Candidates Got Crushed

One of the biggest threats to fair elections fizzled out.

Arizona Secretary of State Republican candidate Mark Finchem sits prior to a campaign debate in September. Finchem lost in the general election on Tuesday.AP Photo/Matt York

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Are you an election-denying secretary of state candidate? In a key battleground state? Then you might be having a difficult election year. 

Election deniers running to oversee state elections did particularly poorly in the 2022 midterms—even in comparison to the underwhelming performance of the Republican Party more generally.

Almost the entire America First Coalition, for example, lost their elections. This MAGA-aligned group comprised more than a dozen secretary of state candidates who insisted the 2020 election had been stolen from Donald Trump. They included Arizona candidate Republican Mark Finchem and Nevada Republican Jim Marchant, both of whom lost last week. In addition, election-denying gubernatorial candidate Doug Mastriano was soundly in Pennsylvania, where the governor appoints the secretary of state. The only member of the group who won the general election was Diego Morales, in solidly red Indiana.

According to CNN, eight out of twelve election-denying secretary of state candidates across the country lost their elections.

Such candidates posed substantial threats to future elections through their professed commitments to use state power to intervene in the democratic process in favor of the GOP.

“When my coalition of secretary of state candidates around the country get elected, we’re going to fix the whole country, and President Trump is going to be president again in 2024,” Marchant said at a rally held by the former president in October. In August, a judge had thrown out Finchem’s lawsuit to try to get voting machines banned in this past election.

“It doesn’t really matter who’s running for assembly or governor or anything else. It matters who is counting the vote for that election,” Rachel Hamm, a member of the group who was running in California, said bluntly over the summer. (Hamm was defeated in the primary.)

Election-denying candidates running for other offices fared slightly better last week, but they still failed to live up to red-wave–powered exceptions. Twelve out of 24 election-denying gubernatorial candidates lost their elections, with the results for Alaska and Arizona still not finalized. Eight of 19 election-denying Senate candidates lost their races.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate