How Do Mother Jones Readers Feel About Biden’s Student Loan Relief?

“I’d rather see free healthcare.”

Bonnie Cash/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Last week, President Biden finally unveiled his plan to cancel large portions of student debt—up to $20,000 for Pell Grant recipients and $10,000 for most others—fulfilling a key campaign promise to deliver relief for a generation saddled with skyrocketing student loan debt. The plan’s details have since kicked off a wave of reactions, editorials, and, rather unsurprisingly, Republican lies about how Biden’s decision will mostly benefit the elite. (It doesn’t.)

But beyond the commentariat, the announcement has clearly struck a deeply personal note for countless Americans. We asked our newsletter readers (subscribe here!) to weigh in on how they’re feeling about Biden’s move. Will any new life plans be possible now? Are they disappointed that Biden didn’t go bigger? Or, did they oppose canceling student debt altogether? Some of the answers might surprise you. Let’s take a look.

Laura is grateful:

I am on of the millions affected by the student loan debt cancellation and I have a LOT of opinions about how awesome this plan is.  Currently working off my insurmountable debt on the Public Service Loan Forgiveness plan (thank you Obama) and not too far to go on that to qualify for forgiveness (on year 9 of my 10 year plan) and as someone for whom literally almost every person I know has student debt, I know this plan is, as Bernie would say, YUGE. One of the biggest boons is the policy on interest, which made it almost impossible for those with crushing debt to get free. This offers a window of hope for those of us who have nearly $100,000 in debt but make less than half that in a year to find a way out.  
 
Sometimes, politicians actually help us. This is one of those times. Really grateful for this relief.

Donaleen is unimpressed:

I’d rather see free health care.

Paul feels cheated:

I agree with canceling student loans, but feel cheated that those who refinanced their loans like me are not included. 

Trudy wants to keep the momentum going:

Having had the ‘luxury’ of attending San Jose State University, graduating in 1984, I am beyond distressed at what students in the past few decades have had to pay to go to college.

 
To the best of my memory, I was paying $300 or, at most, $600 per semester. At possibly $1200 for a year just factoring inflation that would be $3,248 now. In fact, it’s actually $3,950 for one semester now, so  $7,900 for a 2 semester year. That’s over double. 
 
I presume it’s obvious that I’m in favor of the forgiveness of the debt, even $10,000 is a help to many, and feel we need to go a lot further by making college less expensive for anyone that wishes to attend. 

Nina is pessimistic but open-minded about life’s twists and turns:

My initial reaction was: that will make no difference. With over a hundred grand in student debt, 10 grand is hardly a peep. But thanks Joe. I’m looking for full student debt forgiveness for folks who make under 50,000 like myself.  At least until I make more. If I make more, then I give more.  Keep it open if you want. You never know, I could strike it Rich! 

Bridget is disappointed:

As a 55+ person with student loan debt from an MA degree, I was disappointed that there was no plan aimed specifically at senior student loan debtors. It would really help with savings for retirement for those of us who will have to work until we’re 70. They should have added a plan to progressively forgive student loans starting at age 55 and until all debt is relieved by age 70 or when on SS, whichever comes first. With the exception of high income earners, of course.

Timothy has an eye on the midterms:

The school loan program will increase president Bidens poll numbers!! Way to go joe!! 

Beth fears that this is a bad teaching moment:

I think that teaching people not to repay their loans is a terrible horrible no good very bad plan. How do you plan to make that “fair“ to all the people who didn’t think that they could afford the education and just kept working while other people got amazing education that now they don’t have to pay for?
 
Tough stuff, huh?

Greg is concerned:

Canceling some of the students loan debt will somewhat alleviate a symptom of the problem.. overwhelming debt. But it does nothing to address the root cause of the problem. Consequently the problem will start over and continue when new college freshmen sign up for new student loans this Fall semester.

BJ wishes Biden went further:

Even with the $10k, & possibly $20k, I’ll STILL have $10-$20k in debt & I’m 72 years old.
I’m attempting to live on $712/month in Social Security & p/t work to cover the rest of my bills.  Where do I get the money to make even a minimum payment that doesn’t get eaten up with interest?
 
I only borrowed $6k for school & the rest of the $32k I owe is INTEREST!!
Responses have been lightly edited for clarity.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate