Amid Union Drive, Howard Schultz Is Back in Charge of Starbucks

CEO Kevin Johnson is retiring after Starbucks lost six of seven recent union elections.

Starbucks founder Howard Schultz at Arizona State University in 2019.Brian Cahn/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

When companies are flailing, the founder comes back. It’s happened at Apple, at Tinder, and at Twitter. Now Starbucks is joining the list. On Wednesday, the company announced that CEO Kevin Johnson will retire and be replaced on an interim basis by founder Howard Schultz.

But unlike Apple and other tech companies that have reinstated CEOs, Starbucks is bringing back Schultz with company revenues near record highs. The crisis it faces is not a lack of profit, but a union drive.

Workers at 143 Starbucks locations across dozens of states have now filed for union elections. Workers United, the SEIU affiliate they are trying to join, has won six of the seven elections held so far. Those workers have won despite a union-busting campaign from Starbucks that has involved retaliating against pro-union employees, hiring dozens of high-paid lawyers to try to delay elections, and visits from top Starbucks officials to stores that have petitioned for union elections. Starbucks’ playbook hasn’t been working. Its leaders seem spooked. 

Starbucks board member Mellody Hobson told CNBC Wednesday morning that Schultz is “singularly capable” of engaging with Starbucks workers. Hobson seems to mean that she believes he’ll be capable of stopping them from unionizing. 

Hobson told the Wall Street Journal that Johnson’s departure has been in the works for about a year, well before the union drive began. “It’s been deliberate,” she said. “This is not hasty in any way.” But Johnson’s retirement didn’t require bringing back Schultz.

If Schultz is singularly capable of dealing with workers, he’ll need to do a better job than he has so far. In November, he went to Buffalo to address workers from the stores that sparked the union drive. The speech created a backlash. Schultz, who is Jewish, told a story about how people forced on to trains to Nazi concentration camps shared the few blankets that were given to them. “So much of that story is threaded into what we’ve tried to do at Starbucks is share our blanket,” he explained. Most workers in Buffalo went on to vote in favor of unionization.

Forbes puts Schultz’s net worth at about $4 billion. Starbucks’ share price jumped after news broke that Schultz was coming back. Forbes estimates that he has made $115 million since Tuesday because he owns about three percent of the company. An entry-level Starbucks worker would have to work for more than 3,600 years to make that much money.

Schultz was long viewed as one of the “good capitalists” by progressive elites who cited things like the company’s above average health care benefits and the free college tuition offered to employees through a partnership with Arizona State University. His standing was so solid inside the Beltway that Hillary Clinton reportedly planned to make him secretary of labor if she had won in 2016.

Four years later, President Joe Biden picked Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, a former union leader, to be Labor Secretary after pledging to be the most pro-union president in history. Schultz, meanwhile, was no longer calling himself a Democrat. The times had changed. Now, much to Schultz’s dismay, Starbucks workers are changing them some more.

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate