Many People Have Thoughts About Biden’s Off-Script Putin Remarks

“My gosh, I wish they would keep him on script.” 

President Joe Biden meets refugees of Russia's war with Ukraine at PGE Narodowy Stadium on March 26, 2022, in Warsaw, Poland.BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.

It was no surprise that Biden’s scripted speech on Saturday from Warsaw, Poland, about the Russian invasion of Ukraine would make international headlines. But what has dominated the conversation is his apparently unscripted remark at the end about Vladimir Putin. “For God’s sake,” the president said, “this man cannot remain in power.”

The Sunday morning news shows were packed with Democrats, Republicans, intelligence experts, and the Ukrainian Ambassador to the US providing an array of reactions to Biden’s remarks. The top Republican in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee called it a “horrendous gaffe,” on CNN’s State of the Union. Sen. James Rish (R-Idaho) first praised Biden’s speech saying “Whoever wrote that speech did a good job for him.” And then pivoted, “But my gosh, I wish they would keep him on script.” 

Not long after Biden’s speech Saturday the White House insisted that Biden was not advocating for a regime change. “The president’s point was that Putin cannot be allowed to exercise power over his neighbors or the region,” a White House official told reporters. “He was not discussing Putin’s power in Russia, or regime change.”

During a press conference in Jerusalem, Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated, “I think the president, the White House, made the point last night that, quite simply, President Putin cannot be empowered to wage war or engage in aggression against Ukraine or anyone else.” He continued, “As you know, and as you have heard us say repeatedly, we do not have a strategy of regime change in Russia or anywhere else, for that matter.”

Indeed, Biden himself is acutely aware of the importance of the president’s words. As the Washington Post reported,  “During his presidential campaign, President Biden often reminded his audience about the heavy weight that the words of a president can carry. ‘The words of a president matter,’ he said more than once. ‘They can move markets. They can send our brave men and women to war. They can bring peace.’”

On Sunday, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) also attempted to further clarify what Biden meant. Khanna told Fox News Sunday that Biden was likely “frustrated” after meeting with Ukrainian refugees, and that “there’s no support in the Democratic Congress for regime change. We’ve been the party against regime change for the past 20 years.” 

But that may not be how everyone interpreted it. Republican backlash continued Sunday with a Republican lawmaker saying that while he knew the statement was “off the cuff, whatever the president says carries a lot of weight.” He called Biden’s comments a provocative message to Putin, adding that “anytime the United States has spoken out for a regime change [it] has not worked out so well.” 

Meanwhile, Ukrainian ambassador Oksana Markarova appeared on Meet the Press and said Ukrainians heard Biden “loud and clear.” She said that anyone who is a war criminal and attacks a neighboring country “definitely cannot stay in power in a civilized world,” and that it’s “up to all of us” to stop Putin now because this war is not only about Ukraine. “It’s a brutal genocide attempt to eliminate or exterminate [the] Ukrainian nation, she said, “but also an attack on democracy, an attack on anyone who wants to live peacefully in their own country.” 

As my colleague Dan Friedman reported Saturday, the White House has generally won high marks for avoiding policies or rhetorical excesses that could increase the risk of US conflict with Russia.

But Biden’s comment Saturday marked the second time on a four-day trip to Europe that the president has appeared, intentionally or not, to exercise less restraint in his remarks. On Friday, speaking to US troops stationed in Poland, Biden told them: “You’re going to see when you’re there—some of you have been there—you’re going to see women, young people, standing in the middle, in front of a damn tank, saying, ‘I’m not leaving.'” That seemingly errant line implied US troops might be deployed to Ukraine.

“The president has been clear we are not sending US troops to Ukraine and there is no change in that position,” a White House spokesperson told Fox News later Friday.

So while US politicians and commentators dissect Biden’s statement, the Kremlin spokesperson Dmitri Psekov made it clear that whether or not Putin stays in power is “not for Biden to decide.” Peskov told reporters  after Biden’s speech, “The president of Russia is elected by the Russians.” 

REAL QUICK, REAL URGENT

Minority rule, corruption, disinformation, attacks on those who dare tell the truth: There is a direct line from what's happening in Russia and Ukraine to what's happening here at home. And that's what MoJo's Monika Bauerlein writes about in "Their Fight Is Our Fight" to unpack the information war we find ourselves in and share a few examples to show why the power of independent, reader-supported journalism is such a threat to authoritarians.

Corrupt leaders the world over can (and will) try to shut down the truth, but when the truth has millions of people on its side, you can't keep it down for good. And there's no more powerful or urgent argument for your support of Mother Jones' journalism right now than that. We need to raise about $450,000 to hit our online fundraising budget in these next few months, so please read more from Monika and pitch in if you can.

payment methods

REAL QUICK, REAL URGENT

Minority rule, corruption, disinformation, attacks on those who dare tell the truth: There is a direct line from what's happening in Russia and Ukraine to what's happening here at home. And that's what MoJo's Monika Bauerlein writes about in "Their Fight Is Our Fight" to unpack the information war we find ourselves in and share a few examples to show why the power of independent, reader-supported journalism is such a threat to authoritarians.

Corrupt leaders the world over can (and will) try to shut down the truth, but when the truth has millions of people on its side, you can't keep it down for good. And there's no more powerful or urgent argument for your support of Mother Jones' journalism right now than that. We need to raise about $450,000 to hit our online fundraising budget in these next few months, so please read more from Monika and pitch in if you can.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate