The World Is Less Unified in Its Support of Ukraine Than You Might Think

Still, there’s a remarkable number of nations vocally opposed to Russian aggression.

Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has pointedly refused to condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine.Mother Jones illustration; Mikhail Metzel/AFP/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

If you went looking for evidence of international unity in the days following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, there was plenty to find. Switzerland dispensed with its traditional position of neutrality to freeze Russian assets. Germany, reliant on Russian natural gas and reluctant to arm overseas combatants, halted certification of a major natural gas pipeline and shipped hundreds of anti-aircraft and anti-tank weapons to Ukraine. Even FIFA and UEFA, not exactly exemplars of responsible geopolitical statecraft, suspended Russia from international soccer. 

But that tale of unity is deceptive since it generally only includes Western countries. In the rest of the world, support for Ukraine is far more fragmented. Most notably, two of the world’s largest democracies, India and Brazil, have pointedly not criticized Russian President Vladimir Putin. The silence from India has been especially concerning for the Biden administration, which reportedly has spent days trying to align Prime Minister Narendra Modi with the West’s anti-Russia position. 

When asked last week about India’s apparent reluctance to condemn the invasion, Biden acknowledged to reporters, “We haven’t resolved that completely.” On the one hand, India depends on Russia for weapons and military support, but in recent years, the South Asian power has grown closer to the United States as part of a regional push to counter China.

Global divisions were laid bare at the United Nations on Friday, as India, Pakistan, and dozens of other countries across Latin America and Africa declined to support a resolution condemning Russia’s invasion. (Brazil voted for the resolution, but its far-right leader Jair Bolsonaro has refused to sanction Russia.)

The countries less likely to oppose Russia are concentrated in Latin America and Africa, which has seen consistent Russian aid since the days of the Soviet Union. Even as Russia’s economy has declined and its global power has waned in recent decades, various African countries, particularly Mali and the Central African Republic, receive aid and military training from Russian-backed groups. Among the other UN members that abstained or voted against the resolution, some, like Nicaragua, have long received Russian financial assistance and military aid.  

In other words, though Russia is more isolated now than it was a few days ago—China, only last week a staunch ally, has become more critical of the invasion—the relative disunity outside the West reflects enduring Russian influence and deeper divisions in the US-led international order.

“India favors a world order where multiple powers balance each other out,” Michael Kugelman, deputy director of the Asia program at the Wilson Center, told Quartz India. “The Ukraine conflict, by driving Russia into China’s arms, hampers India’s ability to promote more multipolarity.”

Doubts among US allies are likely to expand if Western sanctions against Russia continue and the economic pain spreads throughout the region. Without Russian natural gas flowing to much of Europe, “you will see energy rationing in Europe,” Henning Gloystein, a Eurasia Group energy specialist, told the Wall Street Journal

Already the nosedive of the Russian ruble has thrown the country’s economy in tatters—an effect that won’t just be limited to the oligarchs and other Putin cronies targeted by sanctions. Reports of Russian people rushing to ATMs are just the start. 

The international outrage over Russia’s invasion may have pushed Putin toward being a pariah in many influential quarters, but is it strong enough to blunt Russia’s military and spare the Ukrainian people an ongoing humanitarian disaster? That remains to be seen. 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate