January 30, 2022

Susan Collins Signals She’ll Hinder Crucial Biden Priorities

The GOP senator is back at doing what she does best: enraging the political left.

Tom Williams/Congressional Quarterly/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Susan Collins, the moderate Republican senator from Maine, has occasionally broken ranks with her party to stand up for what she thought was right. She voted to convict former President Donald Trump at his second impeachment trial, and she voted not to confirm Trump’s hastily selected Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, following Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death just weeks before the 2020 election.

But now Collins has returned in fine form to the role for which so many Democrats loathe her. In her typical noncommittal fashion, she’s refusing to say where she stands on two of Democrats’ biggest current priorities: confirming a Biden nominee for the Supreme Court, and preventing Trump from ever holding office again.

In an appearance on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos on Sunday, Collins refused to say that she wouldn’t support a potential Trump run in 2024. Even with Trump actively in the public eye again—including his vowing this weekend to pardon the January 6 insurrectionists if he were to be elected president again—Collins said she doesn’t see a scenario in which the former president (who won nearly 47 percent of the popular vote in 2020) could win the party’s nomination. By downplaying Trump’s chances, her comments provided cover for her not saying explicitly that she wouldn’t back him. “Certainly, it’s not likely given the many other qualified candidates that we have that have expressed interest in running,” she said, regarding Trump’s chances of getting the nomination. In fact, recent polling suggests that Republicans overwhelmingly support Trump over other potential candidates, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.

As for Biden’s promise to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court, Collins feels that “the way that the president has handled this nomination has been clumsy at best.”

“It adds to the further perception that the court is a political institution like Congress, when it is not supposed to be,” she told Stephanopoulos. Never mind that the Supreme Court has been perceived increasingly as a partisan institution ever since Mitch McConnell brazenly blocked the confirmation process for Barack Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, and then pushed through three right-wing justices on behalf of Trump. Collins’ position is sure to enrage Democrats further, especially as an aging, narrowly divided Senate includes at least one senior Democratic senator who shares Collins’ attitude on confirming a Biden nominee: What’s the rush?

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate