GOP-Dominated Pennsylvania Court Declares Mail-In Voting Unconstitutional

The ruling will be appealed, but it demonstrates the staying power of Donald Trump’s big lie.

Chester County election workers process mail-in and absentee ballots for the 2020 general election.Matt Slocum/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A Republican majority on a five-judge panel of Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court declared on Friday that the Keystone State’s widely used vote-by-mail system violates the state’s constitution—the latest fallout from Donald Trump’s endless campaign to undermine the US election system. 

Back in 2019, Pennsylvania’s GOP-controlled state legislature passed Act 77, which made mail-in voting universally available. For awhile, that reform enjoyed bipartisan support. Before Gov. Tom Wolfe, a Democrat, signed the measure into law, Pennsylvania Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, a Republican, praised Act 77 as a worthy “modernization” of the election code. But as Trump repeatedly and falsely asserted throughout 2020 that mail-in voting—which was becoming increasingly popular among Democrats and independents worried about Covid—enabled voter fraud, Republicans began to change their minds.

After Joe Biden won Pennsylvania in November 2020 on the strength of massive mail-in vote turnout, Republicans filed suit in state court, absurdly arguing that 2.6 million mail-in votes cast in the election should be invalidated. It briefly seemed that a Republican judge might take those arguments seriously, but the state Supreme Court quickly stepped in, unanimously tossing out the Republican lawsuit, which, the justices pointed out, hadn’t even been filed until after millions of Pennsylvanians had already cast their ballots. The Trump campaign attempted to get the US Supreme Court to overturn that decision—Ted Cruz even offered to argue the case—but SCOTUS wasn’t interested.

Republican efforts to overturn the 2020 election may have been thwarted, but their war on mail-in voting shows no signs of abating. GOP state representatives soon filed an amended petition arguing that Act 77 is unconstitutional. And today, the Republican majority on the Commonwealth Court, a lower court, announced that it agreed with that petition and struck down the law. 

Trump immediately voiced his delight with the ruling in a statement. “Big news out of Pennsylvania, great patriotic spirit is developing at a level that nobody thought possible,” he said.

However, the ruling might be short lived. The Pennsylvania Department of State issued a statement saying that it plans to appeal the case to the state Supreme Court, which has a 5-to-2 Democratic majority. And while the outcome remains to be seen, the judges on Pennsylvania Supreme Court have proven sympathetic to mail-in voting in the past. 

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate