January 6 Committee Threatens Mark Meadows With Contempt

The former chief of staff initially cooperated with the committee before declining to appear for a deposition.

Alex Edelman/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The select committee investigating the January 6 riot at the US Capitol plans to move forward with contempt proceedings against Mark Meadows, Trump’s fourth and final chief of staff. 

For the past week, Meadows has danced around the possibility of cooperating with the committee, supplying it with documents and signaling that he would sit for a deposition. At the time, Meadows’ decision to work with the committee seemed to cut a contrast with the behavior of Trump adviser Steve Bannon, who refused to turn over documents or sit for a deposition and was eventually charged with two counts of criminal contempt. 

But Meadows continued to cite (legally dubious) claims of executive privilege as a reason not to turn over select documents, and the fragile detente between the committee and the former chief of staff collapsed. 

In a letter to the committee, Meadows lawyer George Terwilliger II claimed that Meadows decided to stop cooperating with the committee when he learned that it had subpoenaed a third-party communications provider for documents that Meadows claimed were protected under executive privilege. Terwilliger noted that Meadows would entertain the notion of answering written questions from the committee but that he would not sit for an in-person deposition. 

The committee responded with a letter saying that it was “left with no choice but to advance contempt proceedings and recommend that the body in which Mr. Meadows once served refer him for criminal prosecution.” In the letter, committee chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) pointed out that Meadows had cited executive privilege to withhold several hundred documents from his personal email account and more than 1,000 texts from his cell phone while simultaneously shopping around a book about his time in the Trump White House. Thompson also claimed that Meadows has failed to specifically state which areas of inquiry he considered to be covered under executive privilege and that the committee had only subpoenaed call data records regarding particular cell phone numbers.

Thompson’s letter stated that Meadows did, however, produce some important texts and documents to the committee, including an email about a proposed plan to appoint alternate electors in certain states to allow Trump to remain in office, an email from January 5 about having the National Guard on standby, and texts with an organizer of the January 6 rally. 

Meadows would be the third person related to the January 6 investigation to face contempt proceedings, after Bannon, who was indicted in November, and Jeffrey Clark, a former official at the Justice Department, who hasn’t yet faced a full contempt vote in the House. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate