Trump Conspired to Fire Acting Attorney General and Force Georgia to Overturn Election Results

He ultimately backed off—only to incite the Capitol riot days later.

Europa Press/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In the final days of his presidency, Donald Trump schemed with a little-known attorney at the Justice Department to fire then-Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen to advance a harebrained effort designed to force Georgia to overturn the state’s election results. The New York Times reported late Friday that Trump nearly replaced Rosen with Jeffrey Clark—the newest character in Trump’s never-ending, baseless claims of election fraud—but ultimately backed off because a group of department officials caught word of the plot and threatened to resign in protest. 

According to the Times, the effort was the culmination of a month-long campaign by Trump to persuade Rosen to use the powers of the Justice Department to interfere with Georgia’s election results. (Trump himself also interceded, being captured on audio threatening Georgia’s secretary of state if he didn’t fraudulently swing more votes to the then-president). At the same time, Clark was pushing Rosen to challenge the election, and when that failed, he went around the acting attorney general and offered his plan directly to Trump, who agreed that Rosen should be replaced so Clark could attempt to disrupt Congress’ counting of Electoral College votes. When Rosen and other top DoJ officials were informed of Clark’s shenanigans, they formed a plan to resign as a group if Trump followed through.

The alarming episode comes just as the Senate prepares for Trump’s second impeachment trial over his role in inciting the murderous, pro-Trump riot at the Capitol. During the trial, scheduled to start the week of February 8, Democrats are all but certain to point to this report, and you can expect them to specifically refer to an absurd, “Apprentice”-style meeting at the White House to make their case the Sunday before the election was set to be certified by Congress. From the Times:

Their informal pact ultimately helped persuade Mr. Trump to keep Mr. Rosen in place, calculating that a furor over mass resignations at the top of the Justice Department would eclipse any attention on his baseless accusations of voter fraud. Mr. Trump’s decision came only after Mr. Rosen and Mr. Clark made their competing cases to him in a bizarre White House meeting that two officials compared with an episode of Mr. Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice,” albeit one that could prompt a constitutional crisis.

After three excruciating hours, Trump ultimately declined to throw the Justice Department into yet another crisis. The following Wednesday, he appeared at his Stop the Steal rally and incited the murderous riot at the Capitol. Shortly after the Times’ report on Friday, E. Jean Carroll, the prominent writer who alleges that Trump raped her in the mid-1990s, tied Clark to the Justice Department’s unusual decision to take over Trump’s defense in Carroll’s defamation suit against him. It’s the latest reminder that it may take years before the full scope of the Trump administration’s corruption and abuse of power ever comes to light.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate