Democratic Campaign Group Won’t Support Anti-Abortion Candidates

The move by the Democratic Attorneys General Association bucks other party organizations.

Kentucky Attorney General Andy Beshear, who won the governor's race on a pro-choice platform in a deep-red state, acknowledges supporters at his election night party in Louisville on November 5.Bryan Woolston/AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Saturday, Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards’ reelection victory in deep-red Louisiana sent a strong signal that there’s a future for anti-abortion candidates in the Democratic Party.

Two days later, a prominent group of national Democrats sent the opposite message.

On Monday, the Democratic Attorneys General Association, which works to elect Democratic state attorneys general, vowed not to support anti-abortion candidates. That means it will endorse Democratic candidates in general elections and give them financial support only if they back the right to an abortion, even in states whose voters are overwhelmingly opposed to abortion. The group does not endorse or give money in Democratic primaries.*

The association’s decision came just weeks after Kentucky Attorney General Andy Beshear, an outspoken pro-choice Democrat, defeated Gov. Matt Bevin in an upset. Beshear’s victory signaled that Democrats don’t need to be anti-abortion to win in the South. His win also highlighted the importance of the attorney general position as a stepping stone for higher office.

Then came the win for Edwards, who signed one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the country earlier this year. Edwards was supported by the Democratic Governors Association, which currently does not have a policy against supporting anti-abortion candidates. Other major Democratic election organizations, including the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and the National Conference of Democratic Mayors, have supported anti-abortion Democrats in the past.  

Although Edwards is an outlier in the national Democratic Party, he wasn’t the only anti-abortion Democrat to run for governor this cycle. Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, who lost against Republican Tate Reeves earlier this month in the state’s governor’s race, identifies as a “pro-life” Democrat. Hood also supported Mississippi’s “fetal heartbeat” bill, which bans abortion at around six weeks, telling Mississippi Today that he will continue to defend “every single law passed protecting the unborn.” Hood gave up the attorney general position to run for governor, but in the future, anti-abortion attorney general candidates like him will have to run without the political and financial support of the Democratic Attorneys General Association.

“We had two Democratic attorneys general running for office, Andy Beshear in Kentucky and Jim Hood in Mississippi,” says Sean Rankin, executive director of the Democratic Attorneys General Association. “One was pro-choice, and one was pro-life. The narrative in the past has been to win in the South you have to be pro-life, but Jim Hood didn’t win, and Andy Beshear did, so I think that myth is changing.”

Hood’s decision to support Mississippi’s abortion ban in court highlights one of the ways attorneys general can affect access to abortion. Unlike Hood, other Democratic attorneys general across the country have declined to support similar abortion restrictions in court. Last year, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller refused to defend his state’s six-week abortion ban, saying that it violated his beliefs and that the ban, “if upheld, would undermine rights and protections for women.” 

Declining to defend anti-abortion laws in court is just one of the tools attorneys general have to affect reproductive rights policies. Earlier this month, a coalition of Democratic attorneys general successfully blocked the Trump administration’s “conscience rule,” which would have allowed providers to deny patients access to a range of health care services, including abortions and contraception, on the basis of their moral and religious beliefs. Democratic attorneys general have also sued the Trump administration over other anti-abortion policies, such as the “gag rule,” which blocks federal funding to organizations that perform or refer patients for abortion services.

“As the battle for reproductive rights unfolds at the ballot box, in statehouses, and courtrooms across this country, there is no group of elected officials better positioned to lead the fight for our rights than state Attorneys General,” Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, a co-chair of the Democratic Attorneys General Association, said in a statement.

Correction: An earlier version of this article misstated the stage of an election in which the Democratic Attorneys General Association gets involved. It endorses and provides financial support in general elections, not primaries.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate