One Big Thing Those Rumors About a Joe Biden-Stacey Abrams Ticket Miss: Anita Hill

The Democratic star hasn’t forgotten the Clarence Thomas spectacle.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The internet is buzzing with speculation that former Vice President Joe Biden will soon announce his presidential candidacy and tap rising Democratic star Stacey Abrams to be his running mate, as suggested by a CNN report earlier this week and stated a bit more explicitly in an Axios story Thursday. Jonathan Chait at New York Magazine thinks it’s a “brilliant idea.” Eric Lutz at Vanity Fair thinks the ticket could “save Biden from himself.” But there are a few things curiously missing from the mix, namely Abrams herself and what she thinks of this plan—and, more importantly, what she thinks of Biden. 

Abrams’ historic but unsuccessful gubernatorial run in Georgia last year overlapped with the rise of the #MeToo movement, and when asked in a recent interview with Marie Claire if she had her own story to share, Abrams pointed to Anita Hill. She explained how formative it was to watch Hill be grilled about sexual harassment by an all-white male panel of senators, led by the one and only Joe Biden, then the senator from Delaware and chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“I remember the Anita Hill hearings vividly, watching those men in power deny her humanity,” Abrams told the magazine. “So to see women in this moment—especially in light of who occupies the White House—refuse to be dissuaded from demanding their equality, agency, and equity is a testament to the resilience we possess.”

Abrams was a freshman at Spelman College in Atlanta in October 1991 when Hill, then an unknown former employee of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that she had been sexually harassed by Clarence Thomas, George Bush’s pick to replace Thurgood Marshall on the Supreme Court.

Abrams was an activist on campus. In 1992, she was photographed with a group of students burning the Georgia state flag, which at the time included a not-so-subtle nod to the Confederacy:

Later, when administrators closed the campus to quell protests in the aftermath of the videotaped beating of Rodney King, Abrams organized students to call local TV and radio stations to get out their perspective, and the campaign even led to her having a tense showdown with then-Mayor Maynard Jackson.

While it’s unclear if Abrams was involved in any activism surrounding the Thomas hearings, it seems just the kind of thing that would have sparked a fire for her at the time. And while Biden’s questions weren’t the worst of the panel—Sen. Howell Heflin, a Democrat from Alabama, probably deserves a top spot there when he asked, “Are you a scorned woman? Do you have a militant attitude relative to the area of Civil Rights?”—as committee chair, he didn’t do much to blunt the attacks that came Hill’s way, and he also failed to call witnesses who could have supported Hill’s allegations. Hill isn’t holding her breath for an apology, but Biden has expressed some regret publicly about how he handled the whole ordeal, telling NBC in 2018: “Anita Hill was vilified when she came forward by a lot of my colleagues. I wish I could have done more to prevent those questions and the way they asked them.”

What’s more, Abrams has risen to national prominence by proudly embracing her identity as a black woman—her natural hair, her gap-toothed smile, her self-described “sturdy” build. She grew up working-class and isn’t married, and has become something of a model for women of color who want to build a political profile based on authenticity and an explicit rejection of norms that often center on white men. She ran a gubernatorial campaign in Georgia that upended traditional electioneering; she ran Spanish-language ads, held forums with LGBT communities, and wound up tripling turnout for Asian-American and Latino voters, while turning out more black voters than the sum total of Democratic voters who went to the polls in Georgia in 2014. She wowed the country with her State of the Union response and even earned praise from Fox News pundits. It makes sense that every Democratic presidential hopeful is courting her in some capacity.

But with Biden, it’s hard not to wonder if the feeling is mutual. We won’t really know until Abrams says something herself to either confirm or deny speculation about her future as a VP, or even as a presidential candidate herself. And, after all, she didn’t mention Biden by name to Marie Claire. But given how she’s built her national profile, and how the years of her college activism seem to have shaped her, it’s hard to believe that Abrams wouldn’t consider the complicated optics of teaming up with Biden.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate