Republican Brian Kemp Will Be the Next Governor of Georgia

Democrat Stacey Abrams effectively ended her bid to become the first African American female governor in the country.

Secretary of State Brian Kemp gives his victory speech in the GOP primary runoff in Athens, Georgia, in July. Curtis Compton/TNS via ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

After more than a week of contentious vote-counting and legal fights, Democrat Stacey Abrams effectively ended her bid to become the next governor of Georgia Friday night, acknowledging that Republican Brian Kemp would be certified as the winner. In a fiery speech indicting her opponent’s actions as secretary of state, Abrams refused to call it a “concession,” she rather acknowledged that there was “no further viable remedy” moving forward.

Under Kemp, she said in her speech Friday, “democracy failed Georgia.”

The race captured nationwide attention and drew visits from the likes of Oprah and Barack Obama, who hoped to turn this Deep South state blue. Abrams’ bid to become the country’s first black female governor ran up against Georgia’s conservative politics, as well as policies overseen by Kemp, Georgia’s secretary of state, that made it harder for many residents to vote.

Kemp won just over 50 percent of the vote, avoiding the runoff election that would have been triggered if no candidate had achieved a majority and that Abrams’ camp was hoping for over the past week and a half. The election was a clash of progressive policies versus ultra-conservative ones, with Abrams running as a liberal Democrat and Kemp embracing the anti-immigrant fervor of President Donald Trump. In the end, she came much closer than any Democrat running statewide in Georgia in several years.

The race also served as a national flashpoint in the partisan battle over voting rights. Abrams became a political star in 2014 for her efforts to register minority voters in Georgia and hasten its shift from red to blue, as the state’s demographics change. Kemp was Abrams’ foil, a conservative Republican whose policies as secretary of state made it more difficult, particularly for minority voters, to cast a ballot. The election became a contest of whose vision for the state would prevail. Abrams sought to turn out the electorate she had tried for years to get to the polls; Kemp fought forcefully to keep in place policies that made it harder to register to vote and cast a ballot.

Kemp threw a final wrench into the race two days before the election, when he launched an investigation, without supplying any evidence, into the state Democratic Party for an alleged cyberattack on the state’s voting system. The bizarre allegation was widely viewed as an abuse of power and a last-ditch effort to defeat Abrams. Kemp has repeatedly initiated politically expedient investigations that ultimately fizzle without findings of wrongdoing. The episode also raised questions about his impartiality overseeing an election in which he is on the ballot. (Kemp only resigned as secretary of state last week, two days after Election Day.)

Kemp drew national scrutiny in the Republican primary earlier this year with an attention-grabbing ad, in which he suggested he would round up undocumented immigrants in his pickup truck and deport them himself. In October, the Associated Press reported that Kemp’s procedures had caused 53,000 voters’ registrations to be placed in limbo. Of those voters, 70 percent were African American, in a state that’s just 32 percent black. They could still vote with proper ID, but the controversy shined a spotlight on Georgia’s discriminatory voter registration rules that frequently cause minority voters to have their registration applications rejected, and it sowed confusion that threatened to depress turnout.

Kemp spent the last month of the campaign battling lawsuits from civil rights groups that sought to halt various policies of his office that disproportionately disenfranchised minority voters. Two suits successfully blocked Georgia’s practice of rejecting absentee ballots when voters’ signature on the envelope fails to match their signature on file without first giving voters an opportunity to verify that the ballot is theirs. The suits were prompted in mid-October by data showing that Gwinnett County had rejected nearly 15 percent of ballots from Asian Americans and 8 percent from African Americans, but only 2.5 percent from white voters. Kemp defended the practice but lost. Just before the election, another federal judge ruled that recently naturalized citizens flagged as noncitizens when they attempted to register must be permitted to vote. For years, Kemp’s policies have prevented new citizens from voting because of old data in a state database.

The Kemp-Abrams race, which polling showed was tight till the very end, highlights Georgia’s slow shift from a deep-red state to a purple one, as the state’s demographics shift and Republican-leaning suburban voters shrink from a GOP increasingly defined by rage against immigrants and minority groups. But as Kemp’s win demonstrates, Republicans still have the edge.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate