November 11, 2018

Democrats Aren’t Rushing Into Trump Investigations or Impeachment

“I’m not going to be handing out subpoenas like somebody’s handing out candy on Halloween.”

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill on June 27, 2018.Zach Gibson/Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Any Democrats hoping that the party’s big win in last week’s midterm elections would lead to an immediate onslaught of aggressive investigations into President Donald Trump’s actions—or even impeachment proceedings against him—got a reality check on Sunday. The top two incoming Democratic chairmen who will gain sweeping subpoena power both struck a cautious note and emphasized that they are not rushing to pick fights with the president.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who is set to become chairman of House Judiciary Committee in January, said on ABC’s This Week that he will not launch any immediate effort to impeach Trump. “We’re far from that right now,” Nadler told host George Stephanopoulos. 

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), who will gain far-reaching investigative power as head of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, likewise downplayed his plans to take on Trump. Cummings said he will investigate responsibly. “I’m not going to be handing out subpoenas like somebody’s handing out candy on Halloween,” Cummings told Stephanopoulos. “If I have to use them, they will be used in a methodical way, and it must be in the public interest.” 

Trump threatened Wednesday to take a “warlike posture” if Democrats investigate him. “I’m not one to war with anyone,” Cummings said, promising to provide what he said Americans voted for on Tuesday: “accountability with regard to this president.”

Nadler said his top priority is to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Trump’s ties with Russia. He said the “very first witness” he calls before the Judiciary Committee will be Matthew Whitaker, whom Trump tapped on Wednesday as acting head of the Justice Department after he forced the resignation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Before joining the department as Sessions’ chief of staff, Whitaker had criticized the Mueller probe and even interviewed for a job as a lawyer defending Trump against the probe, the New York Times reported on Saturday.

Nadler has raised the prospect of investigating Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who has been accused of perjuring himself in statements he made during his Senate Judiciary Committee testimony in September. But the congressman indicated on Sunday that any Judiciary investigation he launches will be limited to reviewing the limited FBI probe into allegations that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted women during high school and college.

“There was not a complete investigation,” Nadler said. “We have to look into that, with the view that future FBI investigations are not subject to the same kind of White House interference and can be relied upon.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate