October 4, 2018

A Red-State Senator Just Issued a Moving Statement On Why She’s Voting Against Kavanaugh

“Our actions right now are a poignant signal to young girls and women across our country.”

Tom Williams/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Embattled North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp announced Thursday that she will vote against the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, putting to rest weeks of speculation on how the conservative Democrat would vote amid a tight race against her Republican challenger, Rep. Kevin Cramer, an outspoken Kavanaugh supporter.

Heitkamp announced her vote in an exclusive interview with WDAY, a local news station in Fargo, North Dakota. “This isn’t a political decision. If this were a political decision for me, I certainly would be deciding this the other way,” she said. “I can’t get up in the morning and look at the life experience that I’ve had and say ‘yes’ to Judge Kavanaugh.”

The Senator elaborated on her thinking in a statement posted on Twitter, writing that in addition to her concerns about the sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh she believes his testimony refuting the allegations last Thursday “called into question his current temperament, honesty, and impartiality.”

With the Senate’s final vote on Kavanaugh expected this Saturday, Heitkamp had been one of two centrist Democratic senators, along with West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, still viewed as a potential “yes” vote on the judge. Her decision puts additional pressure on undecided Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, and Jeff Flake of Arizona, who are also seen as potential swing votes. If all Democrats vote against Kavanaugh, including Manchin, they would still need an additional two Republicans to tank Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

But her decision might also spell doom for her own campaign. A recent survey in North Dakota, a state President Donald Trump won by a 36-point margin in 2016, showed that 60 percent of voters supported Kavanaugh and 27 percent were opposed. Meanwhile, Heitkamp’s poll numbers have been slipping—with Cramer widening his lead from 4 points to the double digits this week.

The Republican congressman had staked out a bullish position on the Kavanaugh nomination, going so far as to argue that attempted rape as a teenager might not disqualify Kavanaugh, even if the allegations were true.

“She may lose,” Heitkamp’s brother, Joel, told MSNBC on Thursday. “But in the morning, when she’s brushing her teeth, she needs to like the person she sees.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate