Trump Administration Admits It Still Hasn’t Found the Parents of 71 Migrant Children

The ACLU is concerned about “rumors…that mass deportations may be carried out imminently.”

Ever Reyes Mejia is reunited with his 3-year-old son at the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement office in Grand Rapids, Michigan, last week.Cory Morse/AP

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.

The Trump administration has not yet identified the parents of 71 children who it believes are separated from their parents. According to the Department of Health and Human Services, parents have been identified for 2,480 other such children in federal custody, all of whom are between the ages of 5 and 17.

Last month, Dana Sabraw, a federal judge in California, ordered the administration to reunite separated families by July 26. On Monday, HHS official Jonathan White acknowledged in a hearing with Sabraw that the administration has not yet identified the parents of 71 children aged 5 to 17. The disclosure is the latest sign families were separated without a clear plan to track or reunite parents and children.

The American Civil Liberties Union obtained last month’s reunification order, and on Monday the organization asked Sabraw to order the Trump administration to wait one week before deporting parents once they are reunified with their children. Sabraw issued a stay temporarily blocking the government from deporting reunified parents while the administration responds to the ACLU’s motion.

The ACLU requested the seven day waiting period following “persistent and increasing rumors—which Defendants have refused to deny—that mass deportations may be carried out imminently and immediately upon reunification.”

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate