Republicans File Last-Ditch Supreme Court Appeal Over Pennsylvania Redistricting Map

The state’s GOP leaders want to preserve a Republican-friendly gerrymander.

The new congressional map enacted by the Pennsylvania state supreme court.Pennsylvania Supreme Court/www.pacourts.us

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Republican leaders of the Pennsylvania legislature are asking the US Supreme Court to toss out a new congressional map that would likely cost the party several seats in the November midterms. Their appeal is a longshot, but if they succeed, it could help Republicans hold the House of Representatives in 2018.

Last week, the Pennsylvania supreme court enacted congressional district lines drawn by a court-appointed redistricting specialist from Stanford Law School. The decision followed a legal challenge to the state’s Republican-drawn map. Unlike the previous map drawn by Republicans in 2011, the court-enacted one did not give the GOP a major advantage—under the old one, Republicans had consistently won 13 of the state’s 18 congressional seats, even when Democratic candidates cumulatively won more votes. In their appeal, Pennsylvania Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati and House Speaker Mike Turzai argue that the state supreme court usurped the legislature’s power to draw political maps.

This is the Republicans’ second attempt to draw the US Supreme Court into the case and avoid a map that is more friendly to Democrats. The two Republican leaders previously appealed to the US Supreme Court matter last month, before the court’s replacement map was implemented, but Justice Samuel Alito, who oversees appeals from states in the Third Circuit, denied their request. This time, they are returning with the new map in place and essentially the same arguments. Election law experts are skeptical that the Supreme Court will decide to take up the case.

In January, the Pennsylvania supreme court ordered the state’s legislature and governor to agree to a new map and said it would impose its own map if they failed to agree on one by February 15. Turzai and Scarnati drew a map but did not put it to a vote by the legislature. The state’s Democratic governor, Tom Wolf, rejected it as another pro-Republican gerrymander, and last week the court imposed its own map. Now, in addition to arguing that the state’s top court overrode the legislature’s authority to draw district maps, the Republicans’ emergency request to Alito stresses that the legislature didn’t have enough time to comply with the court’s order to draw a satisfactory replacement map.

But as redistricting expert Michael Li at the Brennan Center for Justice noted, this is a stretch, since they never asked the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for more time. 

Whatever the US Supreme Court decides will be closely watched by the whole country, as the court’s new map gives Democrats a shot at as many as four new seats in Congress—a change with the potential to tip the balance of power in Washington.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate