Democrats Pick an Ex-Prosecutor for Pennsylvania’s Special Congressional Election

The final contest will be in March.

Conor Lamb after winning the Democratic nomination for a Pennsylvania congressional seat.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Sunday, Pennsylvania Democrats picked Conor Lamb, a former federal prosecutor, as their nominee for a special congressional election to replace disgraced Republican Rep. Tim Murphy, who resigned in October. The special election is scheduled for March.

About 550 local Democratic officials, mostly precinct level committee members, gathered in the Washington, Pennsylvania, high school gym to select a nominee through rounds of secret ballots. The party members were choosing from a diverse slate of candidates including a pro-life county commissioner, an ex-Assistant Secretary for Veterans Affairs, a former head of the state’s teacher’s union, and an ER physician who campaigned on single-payer insurance.  

Only three candidates emerged with enough votes to proceed past the first round of balloting: Lamb; Pam Iovino, the former VA official; and Gina Cerilli, the chair of Westmoreland County’s board of commissioners. 

Cerilli had alienated progressive activists in the district, describing herself as a “pro-life” and “moderate Democrat”. The most liberal leaning candidates were eliminated early in the contest, allowing Lamb, an ex-Marine and a member of a prominent Pennsylvania political family, to consolidate voters opposed to Cerilli. In the final round Lamb took 319 votes, Cirelli 152, and Iovino 74.

The caucus decision will become official once ratified by the party’s executive committee. Democrats are hopeful that Rep. Rick Saccone, an outspoken Trump-aligned conservative who the Republicans nominated over two more moderate contenders, won’t appeal to the district’s voters.

“Sending him to Capital Hill would be a grievous error,” said Dr. Bob Solomon, a defeated candidate, pledging his support for the Democratic nominee.

The state’s 18th district is Republican leaning, and the Cook Political Report has described the race as “very tough” but “not impossible” for Democrats. The district has tens of thousands more registered Democrats, but Republican candidates perform well at all levels of the ballot. (In 2016, Trump won it by nearly 20 points.)

In his speech to the nominating convention, Lamb, a 33-year old former assistant United States Attorney in western Pennsylvania, hammered Washington Republicans for their tax proposal, cutting healthcare amid an opioid crisis, and failing to pass an infrastructure bill. When reporters asked him about other hot button issues, he was less specific.  

“Five weeks ago, I was in a non-political job as a federal prosecutor,” Lamb said shortly after his victory. But he dodged specific questions about gun control and public funding of abortion.

“Everything like that,” he said, “we can talk about later.” 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate