Sessions is Taking Away Workplace Protections for Transgender Employees

A new memo reverses Obama-era policy protecting transgender workers under Title VII.

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions attends the installation of Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray at FBI headquaters.Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images News

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has issued a memo reversing a federal policy on workplace discrimination against transgender employees, according to a memo first reported by Buzzfeed News Wednesday. 

“Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination encompasses discrimination between men and women but does not encompass discrimination based on gender identity per se, including transgender status,” Sessions writes

Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII “prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.” In 2014, then-Attorney General Eric Holder issued a memo clarifying that Title VII’s ban includes “discrimination based on gender identity, including transgender status.”  

“The federal government’s approach to this issue has also evolved over time,” wrote Holder in the 2014 memo. Two years earlier, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission—which enforces the federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person’s race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability or genetic information—had ruled that “discrimination on the basis of gender identity is discrimination on the basis of sex.” The 2014 memo affirmed that interpretation of Title VII workplace protections.

Sessions’ memo is a direct reversal of this policy. “Although federal law, including Title VII, provides various protections to transgender individuals, Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on gender identity per se,” the memo explains. “This is a conclusion of law, not policy. … As a law enforcement agency, the Department of Justice must interpret Title VII as written by Congress.”

On Thursday, Kris Hayashi, executive director of the Transgender Law Center, issued a statement arguing that Sessions’ move “is a vicious action intended to cause confusion where there was none, with the goal of singling out transgender people and making it harder for us to survive and thrive in this country.”

The memo, though, makes the point that, “The Justice Department must and will continue to affirm the dignity of all people, including transgender individuals. Nothing in this memorandum should be construed to condone mistreatment on the basis of gender identity, or to express a policy view on whether Congress should amend Title VII to provide different or additional protections.”

Advocates of transgender rights have taken a drastically different view. 

“By methodically undermining civil rights law, the Department of Justice under Trump and Sessions has committed—and emboldened others to commit—violence and terror against immigrants, Muslims, LGBT people, Black people, and communities of color more broadly,” Hayashi’s statement reads. “This memo is yet another attack in that vein, with the agency charged with upholding the law now encouraging employers to illegally discriminate against transgender people.”

Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, echoed this sentiment in remarks to the Atlantic: “According to Sessions, an employer is free to hang a ‘Transgender Need Not Apply’ sign in their window. Fortunately, he is dead wrong on the law.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate