Trump Pushes Plan to Slash Legal Immigration to the US

The bill is unlikely to become law in its current form.

Sen. Tom Cotton, President Donald Trump, and Sen. David Perdue announce their legislation at the White House on Wednesday.Evan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

President Donald Trump threw his support on Wednesday behind legislation that would drastically limit legal immigration to the United States.

The president appeared with Sens. David Perdue (R-Ga.) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) Wednesday morning to urge the passage of the Reforming American Immigration for Strong Employment (RAISE) Act, a bill that would slash legal immigration to the United States by as much as 50 percent over the next decade. The legislation, which is an updated version of a measure introduced by Perdue and Cotton earlier this year, would replace the current immigration system with a “merit-based” point system. It would prioritize highly skilled immigrants by greatly reducing the ability of green card holders to bring family members to the United States and eliminating a visa lottery program that helps immigrants from countries that are less represented in the US immigrant population.

“This would be the most significant reform to the immigration system in half a century,” Trump said. He added that by changing how green cards are distributed, the measure “will reduce poverty, increase wages, and save taxpayers billions and billions of dollars.” The White House has worked in recent weeks to reintroduce Perdue and Cotton’s earlier bill, with the input of Trump senior aide and staunch immigration opponent Stephen Miller and the support of chief strategist Steve Bannon. 

Miller forcefully defended the legislation during during a White House press briefing on Wednesday afternoon. “We’d like to create a permanent change to our immigration system that will endure through time,” he said. “What President Trump has done today is one of the most important legislative moves that we’ve seen on this issue in many, many years.”

Sparks flew during a seven-minute exchange between Miller and CNN reporter Jim Acosta. Acosta, whose Cuban father received a green card, asked whether the legislation “changed what it means to be an immigrant” and contradicted the poem inscribed on the Statue of Liberty. Miller was visibly flustered. Acosta later questioned a provision in the legislation to make speaking English a condition for a green card, asking, “Are we just going to bring in people from Great Britain and Australia?” Miller went on the offensive.

“I have to honestly say, I am shocked at your statement that you think that only people from Great Britain and Australia would know English,” Miller said. “It reveals your cosmopolitan bias to a shocking degree.”

Miller added that the reporter’s remarks were “so insulting to millions of hardworking immigrants who do speak English from all over the world.”

https://twitter.com/DaniellaMicaela/status/892829175773487104

The announcement was immediately met with criticism from Democrats. On Twitter, Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), the co-chair of the Congressional Caribbean Caucus, called the bill “a direct attack on African and Caribbean families and refugees,” who often rely on the diversity visa lottery or family sponsorship to enter the United States. “Instead of catching criminals, Trump wants to tear apart communities and punish immigrant families that are making valuable contributions to our economy,” Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez said in a statement.  

The measure faces a difficult path in the Senate, which has struggled to advance immigration legislation in recent years. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee,  told BuzzFeed that passing the measure without significant amendments would likely be “an impossibility.” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) tweeted that it would be “devastating to SC economy which relies on this immigrant workforce.”

Immigration experts say that despite Trump’s claims, the RAISE Act might not bring the benefits that the administration is touting. “The US currently has a pretty good system for recruiting skilled workers using temporary visas, which allows skilled workers (mostly) to work in the US for two three-year terms and get well-integrated into the labor market,” Princeton sociologist and immigration expert Douglas Massey tells Mother Jones in an email. “If they would lift the cap on adjustments from temporary skilled visas to permanent resident visas we would have a pretty good system for skilled recruitment without implementing some kind of point system.”

He adds, “If Trump et al think that a ‘merit’ system will cut down on immigration by minorities, they are quite mistaken.”

Noah Lanard contributed reporting to this story. This post has been updated to include Miller’s comments at the press briefing.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate