Trump Team Falsely Claims Support of Civil Rights Advocates for Jeff Sessions

The people listed have largely fought against civil rights.

John Bazemore/AP, File

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Jeff Sessions, the senator from Alabama whom President-elect Donald Trump has chosen to be the next attorney general, is best known for his hardline anti-immigration policies and allegations of racist remarks in his past. In an apparent attempt to soften that reputation, Trump’s transition team is boasting that civil rights groups are “strongly supporting” Sessions’ nomination.

That statement is broadly false: Civil rights groups have spoken out very critically of Sessions’ nomination. But in order to make its claim, the Trump team put out a press release citing the support of people who, upon closer examination, actively oppose civil rights for immigrants and people of color.

The press release announced the support of “civil rights and law enforcement groups.” But no group on the list is dedicated to promoting civil rights. There are just three individuals on the list who could plausibly be tied to civil rights—but they’re not civil rights advocates.

One is Leah Durant, whom the campaign describes as a “Civil Rights Attorney and founder of the Black American Leadership Alliance.” Durant has long worked in anti-immigration and nativist circles. In the mid-2000s, she worked for the legal arm of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), an anti-immigration group founded by the racist white nationalist John Tanton. Until April, Durant ran a group called Progressives for Immigration Reform, which claims that immigration is bad for the environment. Anti-immigrant activists and white nationalists regularly attended the group’s gatherings. Durant’s Black American Leadership Alliance seems to have popped up in the spring of 2013 to oppose the bipartisan effort to pass comprehensive immigration reform at the time. The group argued that immigration pits Latino immigrants against African Americans in a fight for jobs. Like Durant, many of the group’s members have ties to FAIR.

The Trump team also listed attorney Peter Kirsanow, a Republican appointee on the US Commission on Civil Rights. Kirsanow used that position for years to investigate—and push the Justice Department to investigate—the New Black Panther Party. On Election Day 2008, two members of the militant group stood outside a Philadelphia polling place, leading to years of accusations by conservatives of voter intimidation. Kirsanow opposes affirmative action; according to the Huffington Post, when the late Justice Antonin Scalia famously suggested that black college students should seek “less-advanced” or “slower-track” institutions, he was referring to a brief by Kirsanow.

Also on the list is Robert Driscoll, who served in the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department in the George W. Bush administration, when the division was politicized and failed to vigorously enforce civil rights laws. After leaving the Justice Department, he signed a 2008 letter asking the Civil Rights Division to investigate and prosecute voter fraud, including the group ACORN. As a private lawyer in 2010, he defended Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, who is infamous for his brutal treatment of Latinos and immigrants, against charges of racial profiling. (A judge found Arpiao guilty in 2013. Arpiao was charged with criminal contempt of court disobeying that order and lost his reelection bid in 2016, after 24 years on the job.) More recently, Driscoll represented Republican North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory in his effort to defend his infamous “bathroom bill,” which not only prohibited transgender people from using the bathroom corresponding to their gender identity but also rolled back basic protections for LGBT individuals in the state. The Justice Department sued North Carolina over the bill, and with Driscoll’s help, McCrory also sued the Justice Department, though he later withdrew the suit.

The Trump transition team is bragging about these people’s support for Sessions in what appears to be an effort to claim he will defend Americans’ civil rights. The real message might be the opposite one.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate