7 Awesomely Random Food Tips From the WikiLeaks Dump

John Podesta feels very strongly about the right way to make risotto.

Brendan Smialowski/DPA/ZUMA; gpointstudio/iStock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Beginning last Friday, WikiLeaks has been releasing more leaked emails, this time from Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta. Among the tidbits reporters discovered was this shocking and highly controversial answer to Merrill Lynch financial advisor Peter Huffman’s earnest question on the evening of September 18, 2015:

Huffman: So I have been making a lot of risotto lately…and regardless of the recipe, I more/less adhere to every step you taught me. Question: why do I use a 1/4 or 1/2 a cup of stock at a time? Why can’t you just add 1 or 2 cups of stock at a time b/c the arborio rice will eventually absorb it anyway, right?

Podesta, who’s well-known for his culinary acumen, takes around 18 hours to respond. On September 19, he shoots back with:

Yes and no
Yes it [sic] with absorb the liquid, but no that’s not what you want to do. The slower add process and stirring causes the rice to give up it’s starch which gives the risotto it’s creamy consistency. You won’t get that if you dump all that liquid at once.

This widely-held assertion ruffled the feathers of MoJo CEO and European Victual Advisor Monika Bauerlein, who contends that pro risotto can easily be executed by dumping in all of the liquid at once. She’s not alone. As Food and Wine pointed out, respected cookbook author and chef J. Kenji López-Alt disagrees with Podesta’s claim.

Podesta might be one of the most powerful and influential figures in American politics right now. But López-Alt has science on his side. As he argues in his James Beard Award-winning magnum opus The Food Lab: Better Home Cooking Through Science, cooking the dish in a wide, shallow pan on low heat enables the rice to spread out and heat evenly in the broth. He explains in a post on his blog Serious Eats:

By cooking rice in a wide skillet like this, I found that I could get perfect results by adding the rice and almost all of the liquid at once, covering, and cooking over very low heat until the rice was done, stirring just once during the process.

That’s not the only shocker to come out of the WikiLeaks emails. Here’s a round-up of some more food-related revelations:

“For some inexplicable reason, my MRE contained PB and tortillas,” wrote Podesta’s son.
  • As Politico points out, a large number of Podesta’s personal emails come from grocery store chain Safeway, revealing that Podesta and his wife Mary are—gasp—card-carrying Club Card Members.
  • One set of emails shows Stonyfield Yogurt overlord Gary Hirshberg pushing Podesta to urge Hillary Clinton to support mandatory GMO labeling. Tom Philpott has the story here.
  • Philpott also dug up an exchange between Podesta and “mpodesta,” presumably his wife Mary. In November 2015, Podesta suggests inviting Mark Bittman to their Christmas party. Of the former New York Times columnist, author of a gazillion cookbooks, and Union of Concerned Scientists fellow, Mary responds: “I don’t know who that is.”
  • In Feburary 2014, the Podestas’ son, Air Force Captain Gabriel Podesta, reports back to the fam about a recipe inspired by his time in the service: “For some inexplicable reason, my MRE contained PB and tortillas. Attached please find a photo of my first ever Peanut Butter Taco.” Note to Gabe: Don’t search that term in Urban Dictionary.
  • At a campaign stop in Maumee, Ohio in April of 2015, Hillary’s Chipotle burrito bowl order included chicken and black beans, guacamole, and an iced tea. Writes Clinton’s press secretary Nick Merrill: “No one noticed she was there, which made for an awkward encounter between me and the manager as I was taking aerial shots of HRC ordering. I think he thought I was from the health department.” A Hillary staffer later called a New York Times article analyzing the candidate’s burrito bowl choice as a “new low.”
  • In one exchange, philanthropist Amrita Mahbubani describes in mouthwatering detail the dinner she and husband Ashok planned to cook for John Podesta and his brother Tony. The meal would include tandoori chicken, lamb, and fish roasted in an outdoor pizza oven; freshly baked garlic naan; a yogurt sauce; and a Basmati rice pilaff with peas, saffron, and pine nuts. Dessert included vanilla ice cream with fresh berries or mango, drizzled with Amaretto. Tony responds: “Happy to shop and chop.” Ashok offers that Amrita would do the shopping at Costco, “where she knows where to find what she wants”—adding ammunition to Tom Philpott’s long-held suspicion that rich people love Costco.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate