This Video of a Black Man Arrested After Walking in the Street Is Going Viral

A bystander captured a surprising encounter between a pedestrian and police officers in Edina, Minnesota.


On October 12, a police officer was observed handcuffing a man who had been walking in the street in Edina, Minnesota. A video of the incident, captured by an observer and posted to YouTube, is now going viral online.

The video had more than 500,000 views by Tuesday morning and had spurred a response from the state chapter of the NAACP, the mayor of Edina, and the Edina Police Department. The bystander who filmed it was identified as Janet Rowles in a statement posted on Facebook by the Minnesota NAACP.

According to Rowles’ summary of the incident, a man—identified as Larnie Thomas in the same NAACP statement—was walking along a white line that marked the shoulder of the road because the sidewalk on that side of the street was blocked off due to construction work. An unmarked police vehicle pulled in front of him, according to Janet’s summary, blocking his path forward. The video begins after an officer in plain clothes has already detained Thomas, who is black, and is leading him by the coat jacket to his SUV. The officer was identified later as Tim Olson.

“Dude, damn!” Thomas exclaims, clearly frustrated over the encounter.

“Come over here,” the officer responds.

“For what?” Thomas asks.

“You’re walking down the middle of the street.”

“I’m on the damn white line!”

Thomas, who is clearly agitated at this point, repeatedly tells the officer to take his hands off him, insisting that he didn’t do anything wrong.

The two arrive at the officer’s SUV and a female voice off-screen—presumably Rowles’—suggests to the officer that he could have just told the man where to walk. Thomas, having tried repeatedly to pull away from the officer, concurs, to which the officer responds, “We’ve gone beyond that just a little bit.”

Minutes later, a second police car arrives and an officer gets out to handcuff and arrest Thomas. Thomas complies, at this point having already removed his jacket and shirt in effort to break free of Olson’s grip. “You could have just shown him where to walk really kindly,” the woman observing the incident calls out to the first officer. “You are the one who incited this.” Then, a third officer approaches her to take her information.

Thomas was never taken to jail, but instead was released at a shopping mall upon his request, the mayor of Edina said in a statement. The citation against Thomas will be dropped, the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported Monday.

On Friday, the Edina Police Department posted a statement on Facebook saying that Olson had flashed his lights at Thomas after observing him walking “in the southbound lane of traffic”; that Thomas ignored the police vehicle and walked around it; and that Thomas was “defiant” when Olson began to follow him down the street on foot. At that point, Olson smelled alcohol on Thomas’ breath, according to the statement; a breathalyzer test confirmed that Thomas had consumed alcohol. Thomas’s presence in the street was a threat to his and drivers’ safety, police said.

But the NAACP and Rowles have wondered whether Thomas’s stop was racially motivated. Edina—a town about 30 miles southwest of Minneapolis—is nearly 90 percent white. The Minnesota NAACP made a number of demands in response to the incident, including that the Edina Police Department re-train officers on implicit and explicit bias and begin to collect better demographic data on traffic stops. In a response, the police department said that a division of the Minnesota state police had launched an independent investigation into the incident, but that Olson and all other officers involved had followed “established procedures.” It did, however, invite the NAACP to work with the department on developing reforms.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate