July 8, 2016

Trump Touts Endorsement of a Man Who Was Convicted of Murder and Repeatedly Accused of Fraud

The GOP apparent nominee uses boxing promoter Don King as a reference.

Alex Menendez/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Donald Trump bragged at a rally on Wednesday night that he had secured the endorsement of legendary boxing promoter and wild-hair-enthusiast Don King. The sports impresario had recently published an editorial urging people vote for Trump. The article was a long and rambling rant. (“White women of America please accept and believe this unmitigated fact…that the evil corrupt way of life system of white supremacy and control is your deadly enemy…NOT DONALD J. TRUMP!!!.“) King insisted that voting for Trump was the only way to defeat the “evil corrupt rigged system which has been persecuting, lynching and murdering us for over 300 years.” And Trump told the crowd in Cincinnati, Ohio, that he hoped King would speak at the upcoming GOP convention:

You know who I just spoke to? Big Don King, big Don King. Big Don, greatest boxing promoter of all time. I said, “Don, I’d love you to speak at the convention, because you know what? You’ve beat the system.” And he’s a friend of mine.

Trump was animated as he boasted about King’s endorsement. But bringing King to the convention to testify in favor of Trump would be an odd move. Despite King’s successes in the world of boxing—he has promoted almost every major boxer in the last 50 years—he has a long checkered past, filled with allegations of fraud.

A short list of some of King’s sketchier moments includes:

  • In 1982, Muhammad Ali sued King for allegedly cheating him out of $1.1 million he was owed for fighting Larry Holmes. (Ali dropped the lawsuit after King paid him $50,000.)
  • In 1984, Larry Holmes sued King for allegedly cheating him out of several million dollars. (Holmes settled for $100,000.)
  • In 1987, boxer Tim Witherspoon sued King for $25 million, claiming King was violating anti-trust and racketeering laws. (Witherspoon and King settled out of court for $1 million.)
  • Investigations by Sports Illustrated and PBS’ Frontline linked Don King to mob figures, including John Gotti, and the Frontline feature alleged that King had bribed a judge in Cleveland in 1967 to help him beat a murder rap. (King was found guilty of second-degree murder for stomping an employee to death over a debt, but the charge was later reduced by the judge to non-negligent manslaughter, and King served nearly four years. He was pardoned by the governor of Ohio in 1983.)

King has had problems with another one of Trump’s celebrity endorsers: Mike Tyson. During some of the most tumultuous years of Tyson’s career, Trump “advised” the heavyweight champion, while King promoted his fights. In the end, Tyson sued King for $100 million, alleging King cheated him out of millions. The case was settled for $14 million.

So what kind of man does Tyson think King is? Here’s what Tyson said in the 2008 movie Tyson: “I got caught up with this other piece of shit Don King, who is a wretched, just a wretched, slimy, reptilian motherfucker…He’s just a bad man, a real bad man…He would kill his mother for a dollar. He’s ruthless, he’s deplorable, he doesn’t know how to love anybody.”

Trump is right that King has “beaten the system.” He succeeded in getting the second-degree murder conviction reduced and obtaining a pardon. King  also beat two federal indictments. In 1988, he was found not guilty on fraud charges, and in 1985, King was found not guilty of tax evasion charges. King’s lawyers admitted that the promoter had failed to report income, but they blamed it on accounting errors and King’s lack of understanding of the system. The prosecutor in that case was fellow Trump supporter Rudy Giuliani.

So how could someone with all this baggage wind up being touted by a GOP presidential nominee as a reference? Maybe King’s catchphrase is the best explanation: “Only in America!”

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate