Al Franken Is Worried About Pokemon Go

The Minnesota senator is concerned about the game’s privacy policies.

Ron Sachs/ZUMA; Pokémon Company

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Pokemon Go is all the internet cares about at the moment. Within the first week of the game hitting app stores in the United States, the augmented-reality game has been downloaded more than Tinder and is on pace to move past Twitter in active users, with an estimated 7.5 million downloads so far. It’s causing headaches at the Holocaust Museum and late-night gym battles outside the White House.

But one senator is worried that the game’s maker has gone too far in trying to catch all of its users’ information. On Tuesday afternoon, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) sent a letter to Niantic, the company behind Pokemon Go, posing a series of questions to clarify how the company will handle user information. “While this release is undoubtedly impressive,” Franken wrote, “I am concerned about the extent to which Niantic may be unnecessarily collecting, using, and sharing a wide range of users’ personal information without their appropriate consent.”

Media reports over the weekend highlighted that Niantic pushes users to sign up for the app by linking it to their Google account. And unlike many such services, for which a person signs up with a Google or Facebook account but only hands over limited information to the third-party app, Niantic’s privacy policy said it gathered access to a user’s full account—including the contents of his or her Gmail account—when the user signs up for Pokemon Go.

Niantic quickly responded to the news reports and said it would dial back the amount of information it can access from Google. But Franken wants to be extra sure that Pokemon Go is not exploiting its users’ privacy. “When done appropriately, the collection and use of personal information may enhance consumers’ augmented reality experience,” Franken continued, “but we must ensure that Americans’—especially children’s—very sensitive information is protected.”

Franken oversees a Senate subcommittee on privacy, technology, and the law and has used that perch to question companies like Uber on how they handle user information.

Read Franken’s full letter below:

 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate