After Immigration Deadlock, Obama Slams Republican Refusal to Confirm SCOTUS Nominee

The Supreme Court’s 4-4 tie leaves the president’s immigration plan blocked.


President Barack Obama sharply criticized Republicans in Congress on Thursday for “willfully” preventing the Supreme Court from functioning properly, effectively placing the blame for the deadlock in a high-stakes immigration case, United States v. Texas, on their refusal to confirm his Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.

“Today, the Supreme Court was unable to reach a decision,” Obama said in a press conference from the White House. “This is a part of the consequence of the Republican failure so far to give  a fair hearing to Mr. Merrick Garland.”

“Today’s situation underscores the degree to which the court is not able to function the way it’s supposed to,” he continued. “The court’s inability to reach a decision in this case is a very clear reminder of why it’s so important for the Supreme Court  to have a full bench.”

Shortly before the president’s remarks, the Supreme Court announced that it could not reach a decision in the case, which challenged the president’s executive action to protect nearly 4 million undocumented immigrants from the threat of deportation and allow them to legally obtain work in the United States. The tie upholds a lower court’s ruling that prevent Obama’s plan from taking effect.

“Today’s decision is frustrating to those who seek to grow our economy and bring a rationality to our immigration system and to allow people to come out of the shadows who are left with a perpetual shadows on them.”

Obama said that the tie took “us further from the country we aspire to be.” He also pointed to the upcoming general election as a choice Americans can make on delivering progress to a broken immigration system.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate