Elizabeth Warren Blasts Her Republican Colleagues for Obstructing Obama’s Nominees

GOP obstructionism over Merrick Garland pushed her over the edge.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) meets with Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland in April.Douliery Olivier/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Sen. Elizabeth Warren is fed up with Republicans’ obstruction in Congress. In a report released Monday detailing Senate Republicans’ efforts to block President Barack Obama’s judicial and executive nominees, Warren’s office accused the majority party in the Senate of striving to keep key government positions “empty as long as possible,” thereby fueling a “new and dangerous Republican extremism.”

“The idea that Senate Republicans are willing to leave [the Supreme Court] short-handed for nearly a year seems shocking,” the Massachusetts Democrat noted in a press release accompanying the 13-page report. “But the fact is that, for more than seven years, they have waged an unrelenting campaign to keep key positions throughout government empty.”

Obama nominated Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court in March, a month after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. But Republican leaders in Congress have refused to consider Garland’s nomination, insisting instead that the spot should be filled by the next president.

According to Warren’s report, such delays have been standard throughout Obama’s presidency. Fewer of Obama’s judicial nominees have been confirmed than under previous presidents, and those who have been approved faced a longer confirmation process.

Meanwhile, the confirmation process for executive officials—including Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, and Labor Secretary Thomas Perez—has slowed to a crawl. A study from the Duke Law Journal cited in the report found that the average time the Senate took to confirm a president’s nominees climbed from 59 days under Ronald Reagan to 127 days during Obama’s first six years in office.

“Senate Republicans should have stood up to this extremism years ago—but it is not too late to do so now,” Warren’s report notes. “It just takes some political courage.”

Read the full report here.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate