A Win for the Democratic Establishment in Much-Watched Senate Primary

Maryland’s Chris Van Hollen defeats fellow House member Donna Edwards in a race that echoed the Clinton-Sanders matchup.

Tom Williams/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Rep. Chris Van Hollen knocked off Rep. Donna Edwards in the Maryland Democratic primary Tuesday night, clearing the way for him to run for the Senate seat being vacated by retiring five-termer Barbara Mikulski.

Van Hollen will be the overwhelming favorite to win the general election in the fall in heavily blue Maryland. The crowded Republican primary has yet to be called. In a Washington Post poll earlier this month, state Rep. Kathy Szeliga led the pack with 15 percent, but about 60 percent of the state’s Republicans didn’t have a preferred candidate.

If elected in November, Van Hollen will bring to the Senate a knack for legislative maneuvering and deal-making. A member of the Democratic House leadership team, he has worked closely with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and President Barack Obama to oppose Republican efforts to slash the budget, eviscerate Obamacare, and hold the debt ceiling crisis, helping to forge deals concerning these and other contentious issues.

Edwards ran against Van Hollen as an outsider progressive. The two didn’t disagree all that much on policy, but they clashed over how the Democratic Party should position itself and approach legislating. It was easy to see their battle as a state-level replica of the fight between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, with both Van Hollen and Edwards sounding at times like their national counterpart: Van Hollen hailed his insider acumen and ability to get things done, and Edwards pointed to her bedrock progressive principles and willingness to challenge the status quo, including the Democratic establishment. But the race broke down along racial divides, with pre-election polls showing that white voters favored Van Hollen by huge margins and black voters preferred Edwards, whose supporters noted that if elected she would be only the second African American woman to serve in the Senate.

Read more about the campaign between Van Hollen and Edwards here.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate