Thailand’s New Military Government Is Secretly Vacuuming Up Facebook Data

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-1368298p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">antb</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Despite all the ways Facebook has flouted privacy standards—like how it recently experimented with 700,000 users’ emotions by manipulating the positive and negative content of their newsfeeds—the company hasn’t yet provided personal data to oppressive governments. But that didn’t deter the Thai junta. When Facebook refused to help Thailand’s newly installed military government access users’ personal information, the junta created a misleading Facebook application to capture its citizens’ names and email addresses. 

The military government posted that they were collecting this data to “handle more witnesses which can lead to more prosecutions and will make the online society more clean.”

As you might remember, back in May, after months of anti-government protests, Thailand’s military staged a coup. Once in power, the military suspended the constitution, installed a 10 p.m. curfew, banned gatherings of more than five people, and attempted to suppress dissidents—including any of the estimated 28 million Thai users on Facebook, a third of the country’s population. On May 29, the new government tried to have a meeting with social-media companies, including Facebook, to discuss censoring Thailand’s anti-coup dissent, but none of them showed up.

But the Thai junta didn’t take this as a sign to give up on tapping into the power of social media. Instead, as the Electronic Frontier Foundation reports, the junta placed a Facebook login button to track users on more than 200 of the government’s restricted websites, like the webpage of Human Rights Watch.

Before the coup this May, Thai users would have seen websites like the HRW page blocked by Thailand’s Technology Crime Suppression Division. But after the coup, Thai citizens noticed they were being rerouted to a page that included two new buttons: a blue “log in with Facebook” button and a blue “close” button. Both buttons took the user to a Facebook application created by the junta that asked users for permission to access data in their Facebook profiles. Simply logging in and clicking “okay” to the application’s first page would immediately allow the TCSD, without disclosure, to access the user’s email address, age, gender, date of birth, and other information, the nonprofit Thai Netizen Network warned Thai Facebook users.

According to the Electric Frontier Foundation blog, which reported this story from local Thai news, the junta was able to harvest hundreds of email addresses this way. As EFF reports, Facebook has been pushing back against this type of behavior:

A deceptive Facebook app without a clear privacy policy or embedded explanation is a violation of Facebook’s own platform policies, and the Crime Suppression Division’s app has now been suspended by Facebook at least twice. The first “Login” app was removed shortly after the Thai Netizen Network published details of its deceptive appearance. An identical app which subsequently replaced it on the page was suspended by Facebook after less than a week of operation.

The Technology Crime Suppression Division later posted that they were collecting this data to “handle more witnesses which can lead to more prosecutions and will make the online society more clean.” Relative to its recent behavior, faking Facebook was a quiet move by the military. Certainly quieter than the junta persecuting a man reading George Orwell’s 1984 in public. Or detaining those wearing T-shirts with either pro-peace or anti-coup messages. Or reportedly blocking Facebook outright for about a half hour, which spurred a flurry of online protests (the government’s official line is that it was a technical glitch). It’s no wonder Thai citizens trust the social-media platform more than their own government.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate