Bizarre Super-PAC Targets Liberal Icon Raúl Grijalva…and Sheriff Joe

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.).Will Seberger/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), a progressive stalwart in Congress, doesn’t have much to worry about in his primary election Tuesday. But in the lead-up to it, Grijalva got a nasty taste of the dark-money-funded political warfare that has characterized the 2012 elections.

Voters in Grijalva’s southwestern Arizona district opened their mailboxes in recent days to find a mailer attacking their congresssman for voting to cut $716 billion from Medicare, missing more than 400 votes in Congress, and having “voted against jobs for Arizona.” The mailer’s opposite side strongly endorsed Grijalva’s opponent, Amanda Aguirre, calling her “a real Democrat who fights for the middle class.” The mailer’s source: A mysterious, blandly named super-PAC called the Opportunity for All Committee.

Opportunity for All has yet to disclose a single donor, and its official address appears to be an empty dirt lot in El Paso, Texas. Grijalva calls the group “a case study in dark money.”

Grijalva was so incensed by the anonymous attacks on him that he called a press conference to rebut them. In a phone interview Monday afternoon, Grijalva told me he felt compelled to respond to Opportunity for All because he saw the group’s mailers as an effort to mislead voters by distorting his record. “We saw we were gonna be victims to this bullshit, and so [we] decided we’re gonna push back,” he says.

The man behind Opportunity for All is Carlos Sierra, a Republican operative who worked as an aide to Sen. John McCain and managed former Louisiana Gov. Buddy Roemer’s 2012 GOP primary bid. Sierra registered Opportunity for All as a super-PAC just a week before Grijalva’s primary. And though super-PACs must disclose their donors, Opportunity for All has yet to disclose any of its funders.

Sierra told me in an email that Opportunity for All “just started and of course I will be disclosing my donors.” In another email he said that he created his super-PAC to push the broader agenda of his new political consulting firm, Sierra Public Affairs: “moderating politics.” That’s shorthand, he says, for booting out the more ideological members of the Democratic and Republican parties. “I’m going after left-wingers and right-wingers,” he told me. “My next project is going after Sheriff Joe Arpaio…I know I will make enemies but our country needs an ass-kicking.”

Given his history, it’s somewhat unusual that Sierra would embrace the big money politics of 2012 in his quixotic mission to temper politics. Until this spring, Sierra worked for Roemer, a charismatic, long-shot candidate who refused to accept donations greater than $100 and assailed the influence of big donors, super-PACs, and shadowy nonprofits. After abandoning his presidential bid, Roemer started the Reform Project to press for reforms such as term limits and campaign finance caps.

Sierra says Roemer is “a political hero of mine.” But he and Roemer differ on how to make the changes they believe are necessary. “I fight fire with fire and Buddy fights it by example,” Sierra says. “I should be allowed to start my own committee and go after politicians that are bad for our country, and I am doing that. The Raúl Grijalvas and the Mitch McConnells of the world need to go.”

Grijalva, for his part, says his opponent in his Democratic primary, Amanda Aguirre, is in fact a Republican in disguise. He points to photos of Sierra alongside an Aguirre campaign staffer as evidence that Sierra and Aguirre are in cahoots in trying to oust Grijalva. He also says tactics like Sierra’s are bound to cause headaches in other districts nationwide. “I’m not the only one who has to deal with this stuff,” he says. “I don’t know how it’s playing elsewhere, but I’m not taking it lying down.”

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate