Study: Los Angeles Average Temps to Rise 4 to 5 Degrees by 2041

"Extreme Hot Days" to Rise for LA Courtesy of <a href=http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/climate-change-in-la-235493.aspx">UCLA</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A team of UCLA scientists recently fed about 20 global climate models into powerful supercomputers to calculate just how much Los Angeles-area temperatures might increase over the next few decades. After months of complex computing—about eight times as many individual calculations as there are grains of sand on the West Coast of the United States—the scientists’ computers spit out some troubling projections

By 2041, the UCLA team found, temperatures in Los Angeles will rise by an average of 4 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit. The number of “extreme hot days”—days with temperatures above 95 degrees—will triple in the downtown area and will quadruple or more in inland valleys, deserts, and mountains.

Dramatic shifts will occur even if the world manages to successfully curtail greenhouse gas emissions. In the unlikely event that the world starts to get its emissions problems under control, Los Angeles temperatures will still reach 70 percent of the study’s “business-as-usual” levels, the researchers found.

Alex Hall, the head researcher on the study, previously focused his work on global temperature changes. (He’s a lead author on the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports.) He was surprised to discover just how much temperature change many Los Angelenos could see during their lifetimes. “It was very eye-opening,” he says.

“We don’t have a choice in adapting to climate change,” he says. “It’s coming here, in my backyard. It’s not just the polar bears.”

The Department of Energy and the Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability (LARC)—a consortium of Los Angeles-area governments, organizations, and universities, including UCLA, that collaborate on climate change and sustainability solutions—funded the study. LARC hopes to use the data to coordinate policy efforts and adaptation strategies. 

The UCLA study’s findings could eventually drive decisions such as where to locate cooling centers for vulnerable populations and how to plan water conservation. The data could also inform the design of other sustainability initiatives, including reducing energy use associated with air conditioning, expanding cool roofs, and planting greenery. But the city still has “a long way to go” in developing a working solution to the impending midcentury heat, Paul Bunje, LARC’s managing director, told Mother Jones. “We don’t have a choice in adapting to climate change. It’s coming here, in my backyard. It’s not just the polar bears.”

The “most important thing,” about the UCLA study, Bunje says, “is we now have fine-scaled data to do some real planning in the city.” Now it’s up to LARC and the city to make sure that data gets used.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate