Marco Rubio: Compassionate Conservative?

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.)St. Petersburg Times/ZUMApress.com

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Thursday, while the country was digesting the lowlights of the latest GOP presidential debate, some of the Republican faithful were in DC hearing from a lawmaker many Republicans would like to see on the ticket in 2012: Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.).

Rubio, who’s on the short list of potential vice presidential candidates, didn’t disappoint. The man occasionally called the “Cuban Barack Obama” wowed a crowd of conservative Federalist Society lawyers with a speech on the “Constitution of Small Government.” It could have been really dry, but was, in fact, almost inspirational.

Rubio was propelled to victory last fall thanks to his wooing of Florida tea partiers with fiery speeches about fiscal responsibility and smaller government. Despite his Cuban ancestry, he campaigned as an immigration hawk. And he even showed little sympathy for extending unemployment benefits to struggling Americans unless they were paid for by budget cuts elsewhere.

On Thursday, though, he didn’t sound much like a tea partier. Nor did he echo much of the increasing anti-government rhetoric of the GOP presidential candiates. Instead, he actually acknowledged a place for government, took shots at big business, and—gasp!—argued in favor of a social safety net. He sounded like a younger, smarter George W. Bush, articulating something that sounded a lot like compassionate conservatism. It was clear why the unfunny and often dull front-runner Mitt Romney has said he’d like him as a possible running mate.

Rubio was at ease before the crowd, especially compared to some of his speeches last year, where he came off as stilted, stiff—like someone ticking off standard Club for Growth talking points. On Thursday Rubio spoke nimbly for half an hour without teleprompters and barely looking at notes. He broke the ice by comparing Congress to the World Wrestling Federation. He said that like WWF, the combatants fight for the cameras during the day, but after hours you might find them sitting at a bar having a drink together.

Rubio seemed to be calling for a third way, outside the conventional political paradigm, without calling it bipartisanship. He went on:

The most prevalent false choice in modern American politics is the following: There are only two ways forward. We can rely on government, or we can rely on big business. We can either rely on Wall Street, or we can rely on Washington. That is a false choice. That false choice absolutely ignores our legacy as a people, the founding principals of our nation, and our history of as a nation of extraordinary prosperity.

You’d be hard pressed to find a tea partier who will say anything good about the government, but Rubio did. “If some country threatens our national security, we’re not going to go out and hire Wackenhut,” he said to laughs. “We’re not going to go out and hire some private army. That’s the proper role of the federal government.”

Of course, for a conservative, there’s not much risk in expressing support for the military. But Rubio’s defense of the public safety net certainly was an unexpected turn. Rubio said:

Those of us who believe in the free enterprise system believe in the safety net. Not as a way of life. Some people think the safety net is something you should rely on for sustenance the rest of your life. But I believe that if you’re going to have a free enterprise system where people are going to take risks, and people are going to reach for the stars, you’d better set up a net so that if they fall, they can stand up, get back up and try again. I believe we are too rich, too compassionate, too prosperous a people to say to the infirm, to say to the disabled, to say to the elderly, “go out and fend for your self in the market place.”

The Florida senator even managed to hit some populist notes by focusing on small businesses and ordinary people, who tend to get short shrift these days in political speeches. In a gentle jab at corporate America, Rubio noted that big businesses could survive messed up tax codes and burdensome regulations because they have the resources to hire lawyers and accountants and lobbyists to deal with them. But small businesses, the people who start their companies in the garage, Rubio said, don’t have that luxury, and they’re the ones who get hurt.

“We’re not anti-big business,” he said. But he explained, “Neither Washington nor Wall Street is the source of our greatness. The source of our greatness is something much more common, much more understated, and much more misunderstood, and that is the every day lives of every day people. Hardworking people every day are changing the world, one day, one block, one family, one community at a time, and you’ll never know about it.”

The conservatives in the audience gave him a hearty standing ovation when he finished. Nearby, a woman jumped from her seat and exclaimed, “He’s going to be president some day!”

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate