Wisconsin Republicans’ Last-Ditch Schemes to Prevent Recalls

A Wisconsin man protests Republican Jeff Fitzgerald, the speaker of the state Assembly.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/soo/5524843731/sizes/m/in/photostream/">Sue Peacock</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When you think of gerrymandering, shady back-door dealings, and brazen acts of dirty politics, state capitals like Albany, Austin, and Sacramento come to mind. But the Republican-controlled legislature in Madison, Wisc., is giving the most brazen of them a run for their money with a pair of rushed bills aimed at blunting recall efforts targeting GOP Gov. Scott Walker and Republican state senators.

The first bill Wisconsin Republicans are trying to ram through would force (PDF) individuals collecting signatures for a recall petition to have their own signatures notarized. Currently in Wisconsin, people who circulate petitions are required, on each petition, to sign, date, list their residence, and attest that all the signatures they gathered are real, accurate, and belong to people in the correct jurisdiction or district. Fudging signatures is no laughing matter: Filing a phony petition is a felony offense.

Now Republicans want to add one more hurdle with the notary requirement. Critics call the bill as “unnecessary and redundant” and, in the near term, a transparent attempt to gum up the effort to recall Gov. Walker which begins November 15th, for which recall activists must gather, at a minimum, about 550,000 signatures. (United Wisconsin, a grassroots group leading the recall push, says it wants to get upwards of 700,000 John Hancocks.)

Then there’s Wisconsin Republicans’ redistricting scheme. Some background: Earlier this summer, GOPers in the legislature fast-tracked legislation redrawing the state’s congressional and state legislative districts to favor Republicans. This is better known as gerrymandering, a tactic both parties use to make sure their members run in the most favorable districts possible. Walker signed the two redistricting bills in August.

State law says those new boundaries go into effect November 2012. But if Wisconsin Republicans get their way, that won’t happen. A bill introduced by Sen. Mary Lazich (R) would implement the redistricting legislation—but only for state senators—a year early, in early November 2011. Why? Lazich told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel that rampant “disenfranchisement” needed to be stopped right away. Another, more plausible theory is that Republicans want to redraw the playing field before another round of recalls targeting GOP state senators gets underway. (Democrat state senators might also face recall efforts.)

Republicans control both the Assembly and Senate in Wisconsin, but they’ve hit a snag with the redistricting bill in the form of moderate Republican Dale Schulz, a state senator. Schulz, who would’ve cast the Senate GOP’s decisive 17th vote, told the Associated Press he won’t vote for the redistricting bill.

Meanwhile, Wisconsin Republicans have faced a barrage of criticism for their blatant efforts to slow down the recall process. “Unconcerned about the state Assembly, Republican senators are flailing frantically for ways to protect themselves,” wrote Carolyn Fiddler, communications director for the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee. “Their tricks reek of desperation, and we expect Wisconsinites to see right through their flimsy disguises.”

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate