Tom Petty Against the Machine

<a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vegoose_petty.jpg">Camtim</a>/Wikimedia Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It’s been over a decade since classic rocker Tom Petty sent a polite cease-and-desist to George W. Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign, asking the Texas governor to quit playing the 1989 tune “I Won’t Back Down” at rallies and events. The musician believed his song’s inclusion created, “either intentionally or unintentionally, the impression [that the Bush campaign had been] endorsed by Tom Petty, which is not true.”

As they gear up for the 2012 fray, right-wingers still haven’t gotten the message that the left-leaning singer/songwriter is just not that into them.

This time, the offending politico is tea party sweetheart Michele Bachmann, who played Petty’s song “American Girl” at her official campaign kick-off in Waterloo, Iowa. Petty will ask the Bachmann campaign “not to use that song,” NBC News’ Kelly O’Donnell reported on Monday.

This isn’t the first instance of the misappropriation of pop music for political purposes:

  • In 2010, the Ayn Rand-worshipping prog-rock band Rush told Rand Paul’s senatorial campaign, “the public performance of Rush’s music is not licensed for political purposes” after they got word that Paul had blasted their music at his primary victory party at Bowling Green Country Club in Kentucky.
  • In early 2008, soul icon Sam Moore of Sam & Dave put an end to the Obama camp’s use of the duo’s 1966 classic “Hold On, I’m Comin'” stating that “I don’t want to get graphic with this, but how do you take a song about getting girls and turn it into a political thing? Somebody’s really desperate!” (Moore also has some serious conservative bona fides, having recorded some tracks for Lee Atwater’s boogie/R&B album Red Hot & Blue and allowed the ’96 Dole campaign to convert “Soul Man” into “I’m a Dole Man.”)
  • In 1984, unabashed liberals John Mellencamp and Bruce Springsteen were none-too-thrilled when the Reagan re-election team became enamored by their songs—especially because the campaign wildly misinterpreted their critical, non-jingoistic messages as Republican feel-good anthems.
  • It’s not exactly a campaign use, but Rage Against the Machine was not pleased when they heard their aggressive rap-metal was being used for “no-touch” torture at CIA “black sites” and military prisons.

As the push to November 2012 intensifies, let’s just hope the Obama campaign can escape the trend and resist the temptation to add Ted Nugent songs to the DNC playlist.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate