May 18, 2011

Meet the Douche-itors

Photo: <a href="http://www.wwd.com/media-news?module=tn#/article/media-news/the-dudes-abide-3615935?">WWD</a> per Fair Use.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Today fashion bible Women’s Wear Daily (WWD) published a super-manly article on the “dudes” who are the new generation of magazine editors. WWD‘s profile features three straight, white, male editors who live in a bro-tastic world where “these guys say ‘Hey, man’ as a salutation” and “practice their golf swing in the office.” According to WWD, editors Adam Rapoport (Bon Appétit), Josh Tyrangiel (Bloomberg BusinessWeek), and Hugo Lindgren (New York Times Magazine) are “Dude-itors”: editors who are so “neurotically dude-ish” they’re revolutionizing the publishing industry. In the words of Time managing editor Rick Stengel, “They will be the guys who will figure everything out. Or not.”

Here are just a few choice excerpts from WWD‘s look into the lives of these three dudes.

Dude-itors can do that—they’re boys, they’re men, they’re literary, they’re digital. They’re bros who run a magazine.

“If you work in this industry, especially glossy magazines, there are a lot of women and a lot of gay men,” said Rapoport. “The notion of being some meathead frat boy working in this business is not very realistic.”

“He’s both a bro and a dude,” Tyrangiel said, describing Lindgren.

Or Lindgren on rocker Ric Ocasek… “I Love Ocasek. I love his pop songs, and men of my generation hold him in high esteem for marrying the hottest Sports Illustrated swimsuit model of all time.” You go, Hugo!

Also, true dudes can jump onto a roof in Italy.

I think (pray) WWD is making all three Dude-itors look far bigger douchebags than they are. I personally find the entire article a sexist piece of bonobo feces, and I think it does a real disservice to men too. Just because you are a white, 30 to 40-something, straight guy working in journalism doesn’t make you a frat-boy wannabe: it just happens that these three particular straight, white, 30 to 40-something Dude-itors are doing backstrokes in the Fountain D’ouche thanks to the guy who wrote the article, John Koblin. And one wonders: if these guys are so dudely, what are they doing in an issue of Women’s Wear Daily anyway? 

p.s. If you’re wondering what the WWD article would look like dudettes instead of dudes, read Ann Friedman’s masterful parody here, which features cameos by Mother Jones editors Clara Jeffery and Monika Bauerlein.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate