Graham: “Independent” Authority Should Have Confirmed Osama’s Death

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Having already called on the White House to release photos of Osama bin Laden’s body, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) now says that independent experts should have been brought into verify bin Laden’s identity before the body was buried at sea. 

“I think it would have been smart to have an independent group, forensic scientists, maybe from Scotland Yard or some other organization,” said Graham. The South Carolina Republican softened his earlier criticism of the White House being overly sensitive to Islamic traditions in expediting bin Laden’s burial—but said Obama shouldn’t have rushed the proceedings. “Religious sensitivity is smart… but [we could have held] onto body for period of time to allow for indispensable analysis to help us make the case,” he told reporters.

Graham’s statement echoes calls by other Republicans for the release of bin Laden photos. Rep. Joe Heck (R-NV.) told ABC News that releasing images was necessary “to make sure we get rid of any conspiracy theorists that think that we didn’t take care of bin Laden,” referring to the so-called “deathers” who’ve emerged on the fringes of the debate.

Graham, to be sure, also praised Obama effusively for authorizing the bin Laden raid, adding “I have no doubt we have the right guy.” But in criticizing the White House for failing to provide sufficient proof of bin Laden’s death, Graham and his GOP colleagues may—intentionally or not—be feeding the notion that the public can’t trust Obama, and enabling the very conspiracy theorists they claim they’re trying to quell.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate