San Francisco Bans Happy Meal Toys

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It’s a battle straight out of the latest DreamWorks movie: The “bad, blue, and brilliant” Megaminds of San Francisco’s ultra-liberal Board of Supervisors have finally conquered their slick, good-looking, Metro Man nemesis, Mayor Gavin Newsom. Yesterday the board overrode a mayoral veto to ban McDonald’s from offering free toys inside its high-fat, vegetable-scarce Happy Meals. Any local kid who wants to reenact the drama better hurry, because San Francisco McDonald’s restaurants won’t be offering their plastic Megamind and Metro Man figures much longer.

Notwithstanding a recent Onion headline, the law doesn’t totally ban Happy Meals and the toys that they contain. Instead, it limits Happy Meal toys to McDonald’s meals that meet certain health and nutritional benchmarks, such as maximum sodium levels and minimum fruit and vegetable content. Newsom opposed the law because “Parents, not politicians, should decide what their children eat,” he explained in a statement. The sponsor of the law, Supervisor Eric Mar, countered that “this is a simple and modest law that holds fast food accountable.”

According to Yale University’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, the fast food industry spent $4.2 billion on advertising in 2009; some 40 percent of preschool-aged children ask to go to McDonald’s on a weekly basis and 84 percent of parents have taken their children to eat fast food at least once in the past week. Only 12 out of 3,000 kids meals at 12 popular restaurant chains meet basic childhood nutritional guidelines.

The law gives McDonald’s and other restaurants until December, 2011 to bring their Happy Meals up to standard. “We are extremely disappointed with the decision,” a McDonald’s spokeswoman told CNN. But instead of moping, maybe McDonald’s should just adopt some of the can-do spirit of its Happy Meals’ superheroes. Next up on its plastic toy rotation: The Transformers.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate