Do Anti-Government Voters Still Love Pork?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


More voters are opposing government spending in the abstract, but they apparently still favor it when it benefits them personally and on a local level. New polling from the Washington Post and the Kaiser Family Foundation reveals the public’s schizophrenia on the role of government. While Americans have “a more negative view of government today than they did a decade ago,” they still want the government to be involved in their own lives, the Post reports:

[M]ost Americans who say they want more limited government also call Social Security and Medicare “very important.” They want Washington to be involved in schools and to help reduce poverty. Nearly half want the government to maintain a role in regulating health care.

Chris Cilizza also flags the finding that a strong majority want their own member of Congress to bring home the bacon:

Fifty-seven percent of those polled said they wanted their own Congressman to “fight for more government spending in your congressional district, in order to create jobs” while 39 percent said they preferred their member of Congress to “fight” government spending even if it means fewer jobs in their district. A majority of independents (52 percent) said they preferred their congressman to focus on local spending to create jobs.

Such attitudes could have given Democrats an opportunity to undercut the tea party right’s wide-ranging, anti-government animus, by drilling down to the specifics of how their major legislative milestone—the stimulus, health care reform, the Wall Street overhaul—actually help local districts and voters. But only in recent weeks have the Democrats even begun to hammer their Republican opponents on issues like Social Security, having spent most of the election cycle trying to distance themselves as much as possible from their own accomplishments.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate