Wall Street’s Undercover College Scandal

<a href = "http://www.flickr.com/photos/epicharmus/2519028591/">Flickr/epicharmus</a href>

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


Critics of the for-profit higher education industry may stand to gain financially from mouthing off about its colleges and universities, many of which substitute a mission to educate with a fixation on shareholders and profit margins.

Government watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) wrote to Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) on Wednesday requesting that he investigate the ulterior financial motives of the industry’s critics. Harkin chairs the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.

CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan says evidence suggests that individuals who stand to gain financially are making an effort to drive down stock prices of for-profit schools.

“While the for-profit education industry certainly merits congressional scrutiny, Congress must also examine the tactics and motives of the industry’s critics,” Sloan says. “Americans need to have confidence that legislative and regulatory processes are not being manipulated for private financial gain.”

Late last week, ProPublica reported on one of these suspect critics. Johnette McConnell Early has been trying to fuel anger over for-profit trade schools that prey on vulnerable potential students. She even penned a letter to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan co-signed by 19 executives from homeless shelters and service agencies detailing her concerns. Yet Early works for an unnamed financial firm that likely stands to profit if the for-profit higher education industry tanks on the stock market.

Early claims not to know whether her firm is betting against the industry. She did admit that “an investment firm is not going to look into something unless they’re thinking about whether it’s a good or bad investment.”

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate