Wall Street’s Undercover College Scandal

<a href = "http://www.flickr.com/photos/epicharmus/2519028591/">Flickr/epicharmus</a href>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Critics of the for-profit higher education industry may stand to gain financially from mouthing off about its colleges and universities, many of which substitute a mission to educate with a fixation on shareholders and profit margins.

Government watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) wrote to Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) on Wednesday requesting that he investigate the ulterior financial motives of the industry’s critics. Harkin chairs the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.

CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan says evidence suggests that individuals who stand to gain financially are making an effort to drive down stock prices of for-profit schools.

“While the for-profit education industry certainly merits congressional scrutiny, Congress must also examine the tactics and motives of the industry’s critics,” Sloan says. “Americans need to have confidence that legislative and regulatory processes are not being manipulated for private financial gain.”

Late last week, ProPublica reported on one of these suspect critics. Johnette McConnell Early has been trying to fuel anger over for-profit trade schools that prey on vulnerable potential students. She even penned a letter to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan co-signed by 19 executives from homeless shelters and service agencies detailing her concerns. Yet Early works for an unnamed financial firm that likely stands to profit if the for-profit higher education industry tanks on the stock market.

Early claims not to know whether her firm is betting against the industry. She did admit that “an investment firm is not going to look into something unless they’re thinking about whether it’s a good or bad investment.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate