Dawn Johnsen Speaks!

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In her first public speech since President Obama nominated her to head up the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel--and Republican opposition prompted her to withdraw 18 months later–Dawn Johnsen came out swinging. Sort of. While she didn’t specifically bash the Republicans who held up her nomination, Johnsen told attendees of the American Constitution Society convention Thursday night, “I do feel that the nearly unprecedented delay of my nomination was wrong.” She called on Obama to fill the vacant post at OLC, a job that has not been occupied by a confirmed candidate for six long years. 

Johnsen, who had been an outspoken critic of the Bush-era OLC because of its now-discredited legal memos supporting torture, said that the worst part of being in nominee purgatory was the “forced silence” imposed on her. A prolific writer and blogger, Johnsen said that one of the greatest costs of her nomination was being unable to speak publicly in any form, “not even any boring law review articles that nobody ever reads.” There was one upside to the nomination process, though. While the scrutiny of every word she’d ever written for 25 years was a bit oppressive, Johnsen said found the public review of her career somewhat satisfying because she realized how lucky she had been. “I’ve had countless opportunities to work with committed lawyers on issues on which we care deeply. In the end, none of us can hope for more,” she said.

She said she had no regrets about having spoken out publicly about issues ranging from abortion to torture, noting that when she and her friends were in law school, “the one thing you didn’t want people to say at your funeral is that she went to her grave with her options open.” Johnsen said that standing on principle had helped, not hurt her career, and she urged the law students in attendance not to shy away from doing the same for fear it would hurt their career prospects. “We are counting on you to stand on principle and to speak out loudly and with conviction. Our bright future depends on it,” Johnsen said.

UPDATE: ACS just posted the video of Johnsen’s speech. You can watch it here.

 

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate