Toxic Landfill Fails EPA Test

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Remember Kettleman City? That town midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles, where nearly half the residents live below the poverty line and an unusually high number suffer from asthma, cancer, and birth defects? Last month, I wrote that for 23 years Kettleman’s residents have blamed their local landfill, which contains chemicals known to cause cancer and reproductive complications, for their health problems. Those health problems include miscarriages and 11 infant birth defect cases in three years. Well, Kettleman just got some good news.

Recently, the US Environmental Protection Agency notified Chemical Waste Management that its landfill in Kettleman is violating PCB disposal rules. The EPA actually found traces of polychlorinated biphenyls in the soil near Waste Management’s facility back in 2007 but failed to take action, according to local reports. The fed’s current findings discredit Waste Management’s repeated claims that its facility is safe and in compliance with toxic substance control regulations. Central Valley Business Times reports:

[Bob] Henry [Waste Management’s senior district manager] says recently completed monitoring of air, soil and vegetation at the site “has confirmed that PCBs stored and treated at the Kettleman Hills Facility have no impact on human health or the environment.”

Really? Congress banned PCBs back in the Seventies because they were found to be “probable” human carcinogens. Their improper disposal definitely poses a health and environmental risk. Regardless, the EPA’s news bolsters Kettleman’s informal case against the largest landfill in California. The news puts the Central Valley town in league with Anniston, Alabama or more appropriately Warren County, North Carolina—towns that had at least one landfill in which PCBs were improperly stored and local residents complained of illnesses. Stand by for more developments in this story.

Follow Titania Kumeh on Twitter.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate