Ben Nelson: Reform Rage Target

Photo used under a Creative Commons license by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevharb/4453239226/" target="new">Kevin H.</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As the prospect of a violent backlash against health care reform has escalated, you can add one more name to the list of lawmakers who’ve been targeted over their views. Sen. Ben Nelson, the conservative Nebraska Democrat who voted for the main Senate health bill, has confirmed to Mother Jones that he’s been threatened. “We’ve experienced it,” Nelson said, walking off the Senate floor on March 25. But he added: “I don’t talk about it.”

Throughout the debate, Nelson’s office has been flooded with thousands of calls and emails from people “very emotionally charged up, for or against health care reform,” Nelson’s communications director, Jake Thompson, said Thursday. “He chose to try to participate in the debate rather than sit on the sidelines.” But Nelson’s office declined to provide details about specific incidents. When asked whether the FBI was investigating any of the individuals who’ve lashed out against Nelson, Thompson replied, “I’m not going to say.” (He noted, however, that the Senator “might comment when he gets back here next week” after the congressional recess is over.)

In the wake of the heated reaction to his health reform position—after much wavering, Nelson voted for the Senate bill but against the reconciliation fixes to it—Nelson has assumed a lower profile on the issue back at home during the recess. He has not held town hall meetings, opting instead for conference calls. He has also reached out directly to reform opponents like the local Chamber of Commerce. And though he’s referred to health care in some of his recent speeches, Nelson has turned his focus to Nebraska-specific issues like road-building projects. In the meantime, Tea Party groups have organized a large rally in the state’s capital, Lincoln, which is scheduled for next Tuesday, and have continued to pummel Nelson, the only member of Nebraska’s congresional delegation to support the bill, over his vote.

Nelson’s reluctance to publicize the details of the threats he’s received stands in sharp contrast to those Democrats and Republicans who have been vocal about the extremism directed at them. When asked at the end of March about the threats his colleagues were beginning to experience, Nelson remarked, “It’s unfortunate that when you have people threatened to begin with, or if acts of violence are used against people, for whatever purpose, it’s wrong.”

Thompson, the Nelson staffer, noted that the volume of calls and emails that the Nebraska Senator has received has “faded some now that the bill’s been passed.” But with the recent arrests in cases involving death threats received by lawmakers including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the concern about potential violence only seems to be growing.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate