Afghan Police Training: “An Unbelievably Incompetent Story”

U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Dayton Mitchell.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Handing out Sen. Claire McCaskill’s prepared remarks Thursday afternoon as a hearing of her subcommittee on contracting oversight was about to get underway, the Missouri Democrat’s press secretary warned reporters that her boss might go “off the cuff.” Sure enough, after striding into the room and calling the session to order, McCaskill didn’t bother consulting her notes. She stared straight ahead at the witnesses before her and launched into a freestyle assault on police training efforts in Afghanistan. “It is an unbelievably incompetent story of contracting,” she said. “For 8 years we have been supposedly training the police in Afghanistan. And here’s what we’ve done. We’ve flushed six billion dollars. Six billion dollars!”

If only she were exaggerating. Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, who has been in charge of training Afghanistan’s security forces since November, informed Obama recently just how dire the situation is, according to a recent story co-published by Newsweek and ProPublica. “It’s inconceivable, but in fact for eight years we weren’t training the police,” he told the president. “We just never trained them before. All we did was give them a uniform.” 

Gordon Heddell, the Pentagon’s Inspector General, delivered a similar assessment to McCaskill’s committee. “Just about everything that could go wrong here has gone wrong,” he said, adding, “we have to start at the very beginning.”

For this startling failure, which directly threatens the Obama administration’s Afghanistan strategy and the president’s timetable for beginning the withdrawal of troops, there’s plenty of blame to go around. There’s DynCorp, the Virginia-based contractor that has been paid more than $1.2 billion since 2003 to train the Afghan police and whose services have been found sorely wanting by government audits. There’s the State Department, which was originally responsible for overseeing the police training contracts—a responsibility it failed to meet, at times having only three contracting officers on the ground. And then there’s the Pentagon, which eventually took control of the program, running it through an obscure military office and an existing contract vehicle that was only open to bids from five pre-selected contractors. DynCorp wasn’t one of them. The company lodged a protest, it won, and now the Afghan police training contract remains in limbo. This is bad news for the Obama adminstration and coalition forces, but it’s eve worsen for members of the Afghan police, who are dying in record rates.

As it stands, DynCorp’s contract has been extended until July while the Pentagon figures out its next move. David Sedney, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Central Asia, told the committee that his agency will hold a “full and open competition” for the training contract but he said the Pentagon had yet to fully formulate a plan to move the bidding process forward. (“That’s unacceptable,” McCaskill shot back.)

Heddell lamented any delay in installing a new contractor. “If we have to wait for a new contract, we’re not going to do very much… It needs to be fixed right now.” He added, “I’d hate to think we have to get a new contractor on board to start training police officials to survive.”

UPDATE: DynCorp weighs in on the hearing in a statement. Here’s part of it:

We offer a full and expanding set of services and programs to the United States Government around the world. We don’t make the policy, and we don’t set the strategy. We provide the people to help the United States Government execute foreign policy and national security objectives. We earn the privilege to do this work by winning head to head competitions with other contractors. One of the key criteria for winning work is past performance and our ability to consistently win new work is directly related to performing well on the contracts we already have. We welcome competitions and believe that the taxpayer receives best value through these head to head competitions.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate