EPA Block Bad for Auto Industry, Says DOT

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


Efforts underway to block the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse-gas emissions would “profoundly” harm the already-ailing auto industry, warned the Department of Transportation in a letter.

A measure from Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) to block the EPA’s finding that greenhouse gases threaten public health puts in peril a deal on automobile emissions made between state governments, the Obama administration, and the auto industry, both the DOT and EPA administrator Lisa Jackson warned this week. The EPA, DOT, and the White House last year worked out a deal to unify the higher state auto standards, first adopted by California, and the federal standard into one program that takes into account both miles per gallon of gasoline and the amount of emissions from a vehicle.

The deal was significant, as the auto industry had been a major opponent of the tougher state rules. The Auto Alliance and others in the industry have been supportive of the endangerment, as it would eventually subject other companies to rules it is already preparing to follow.

A federal plan is better than “the pre-existing patchwork of standards that would have required companies to build separate fleet for different states,” wrote O. Kevin Vincent, chief counsel at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in a letter to the office of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) provided to Mother Jones. The EPA is expected to announce the first rules for vehicles by the end of next month for model year 2012 vehicles, but that announcement is rooted in the finding that Murkowski’s effort intends to block.

Murkowski maintains that her effort is a response to fears that EPA rules will be economically catastrophic. But DOT’s argument is that her block will be problematic for at least one major industry, too.

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate