Elections Fraught in post-Tiger Sri Lanka

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/indi/" target="_blank">indi.ca</a> (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It was quite possibly the most important election in recent Sri Lankan history, the first peacetime vote in more than three decades. Newspapers around the globe reported that 70 percent of the electorate turned out to reelect President Mahinda Rajapaksa in early elections on January 26th. Yet, as one might expect from a country that less than a year ago decisively crushed one of the longest and most violent insurgencies in the world at an enormous cost to human life, elections were fraught. Fraught in a way only Sri Lankan politics would be: challengers lobbing accusations of war crimes at each other; one blocking the other from voting…for himself; and a supposedly king-making minority that never appeared.

Rajapaksa beat his ex-General Sarath Fonseka, who delivered the coup-de-grace in the government’s 26-year-long war with the separatist LTTE (Tamil Tigers) and subsequently suffered a massive falling out with the President, his erstwhile ally. (Both had hoped to ride their post-war popularity into office). Widely seen as the dark horse after he threw his hat in the ring last month, Fonseka was endorsed by Tamil National Alliance and other minority groups; his victory, many felt, would have proved that despite the extreme violence that characterized the LTTE endgame, the Tamils could still be king-makers in Sri Lanka. 

 

In the run-up to the early January 26th elections, riots and civil unrest left 800 injured and at least five dead. Things were worse in the north, where many speculated that the Tamils–a quarter million of them just released from displaced person’s camps in December–would have a hard time exercising the franchise, or for that matter stomaching the choices, even after both candidates made aggressive last-minute attempts to woo them. Voter turnout in the hardest-hit areas topped out at less than 30 percent.  Yet, so far, elections have been strikingly peaceful. 

The news has brought Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to the country to plead for a level-headed second term–after all, Singh owes a not-small part of his own recent reelection, in May of 2009, to the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu, home to hundreds of thousands of Sri Lankan Tamil refugees (and many millions of Indian Tamils whose interests are tied up in that of their Sri Lankan neighbors) . 

“The peaceful conduct of elections augurs well for the future of Sri Lanka and we hope that the post-election scenario would be free of violence as well,” Singh said in a statement. Let’s hope so. 

 

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate