Michael Scheuer Vying For a Role on 24?

Photo courtesy of <a href="http://authors.simonandschuster.com/Michael-Scheuer/39243089/biography" target="new">Simon & Schuster</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Getting exercised over the mind-numbing stupidity exhibited each day on the cable news networks is easily avoided. Just turn them off. Read a book. Go for a walk. Do something… anything else. But occasionally they’re worth watching (in very small doses), if only for their grim comedic value. Tuesday’s Glenn Beck show on Fox News is a case in point. The conservative blowhard spoke with Michael Scheuer, former chief of the CIA’s Bin Laden unit, about Obama’s proposed plan to send 1,500 National Guardsman to the US-Mexico border to combat drug smuggling. But the conversation quickly went off course, ultimately ranging from Scheuer’s views on gun control (Democrats “want guns only in the hands of the government”) to his aggrieved sense of populism. Scheuer, a highly educated guy himself and one who made a career in the elite echelon of the country’s intelligence service, derided how the federal government is run by elitists who care nothing for the common man. “Now the minority–those folks who go to Harvard and Yale and the prestigious universities who think they know everything and who want the government to control everything–are in power. The majority of Americans… are generally neglected in terms of security by the minority that runs this government.” Music to the ears of Scheuer’s Fox audience.

But Scheuer didn’t stop there. When Beck brought up Obama’s strategy against Al Qaeda, the former CIA man launched into a diatribe you’d expect from Jon Voight’s crazy-patriot character on 24, not from America’s former chief Bin Laden hunter. The transcript speaks for itself:

 

BECK: Do you really, honestly believe that we have come to a place to where those very senior people in the highest offices of the land, Congress and the White House, really will not do the right thing in the end, that they won’t see the error of their ways?

SCHEUER: No, sir, they will not. Not — the only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States. Because it’s going to take a grassroots, bottom-up pressure, because these politicians prize their office, prize the praise of the media and the Europeans. Only — it’s an absurd situation. Again, only Osama can execute an attack which will force Americans to demand that their government protect them effectively, consistently, and with as much violence as necessary.

It should be said, Scheuer penned one of the best books on Al Qaeda yet in print and really knows his stuff, but one wonders, well, what the hell he was thinking. Sure, people often play it up for the cameras on cable news. It’s entertainment after all, isn’t it? But left unanswered is whether Scheuer, like Voight’s character on 24, truly believes that another terrorist attack is just what America needs to get itself back on track. 

Watch:

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate