Blackwater’s Fired Up by Audit Coverage

Photoillustration by Steve Aquino.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Bruce Falconer and I reported yesterday that a federal audit [PDF] of Blackwater’s security contracts in Iraq concluded, among other things, that the firm had regularly failed to meet staffing requirements on two of its State Department task orders and could owe the government $55 million. Blackwater’s spokeswoman, Anne Tyrrell, just emailed an “amended statement” on the audit, disputing how its conclusions were characterized in some media reports. I saw this one coming when I read the Wall Street Journal‘s coverage this morning, which carried the headline, “Audit Finds That U.S. Overpaid Blackwater.” (Similarly, ABC is now reporting: “There is no assurance that personnel staffing data was accurate or complete and that correct labor rates were paid.”)

Here’s what Tyrrell had to say:

The joint audit by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction and the United State Department of State Inspector General released yesterday does not, as some press reports have suggested, allege that Blackwater was ever complicit in overbilling the United States government for work it performed in Iraq in 2006 and 2007. The audit does not even state that the government overpaid Blackwater for staffing issues.  All it suggests is that invoices spanning a period of time are reviewed. A $55 million penalty has in no way been determined. 

In fact, the government contracting officer determined that Blackwater was compliant with the terms of the contract at the time for which they were reviewing and the therefore did not apply any deductions or penalties. Blackwater only billed for services provided. 

Tyrrell is correct on the overbilling issue (and we were careful not to make this claim in our story). From my reading of the audit, it never states explicitly that Blackwater was paid more that it was owed. Rather, it says the State Department neglected to invoke a contractual provision that would have allowed it to dock the firm $55 million for failing to meet the required staffing levels. There’s a big difference here. Tyrrell told us yesterday, and maintains again today, that the company only billed the government for the hours its contractors put in.

What the audit does say, however, is that due to poor oversight by the State Department it’s difficult to be sure whether Blackwater—and presumably other security firms the agency contracted with—had in fact overbilled. “There is no assurance that personnel staffing data was accurate or complete and that correct labor rates were paid,” the audit notes. And that’s a problem—but one that really has less to do with Blackwater (or Xe, as it’s now known) and more to do with State and other government agencies that are overseeing billions in military contracting.

Along with the overbilling question, there’s another enduring mystery arising from the audit. Where the heck is that government-issue deep fat fryer Blackwater can’t account for? The taxpayers insist on its swift and safe return!
 

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate